SMITH v. SMITH et al

Filing 63

ORDER denying 62 Motion for Reconsideration of the denial of his motion for preliminary injunction and motion for temporary restraining order. His motion to reconsider offers no information which warrants a different ruling. See Patel v. Gonzales 4 42 F.3d 1011, 1015-1016 (7th Cir. 2006) (A motion to reconsider asks that a decision be reexamined in light of additional legal arguments, a change of law, or an argument that was overlooked earlier....) (copy to plaintiff via U.S. Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/10/2011. (MAC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

ERIC D. SMITH,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
JENNIFER SMITH et al.,
Defendants.

No. 1:10-cv-256-JMS-MJD

ENTRY
Eric Smith seeks reconsideration of the denial of his motion for preliminary
injunction and motion for temporary restraining order. His motion to reconsider offers no
information which warrants a different ruling, and the motion to reconsider [62] is
therefore denied. See Patel v. Gonzales 442 F.3d 1011, 1015-1016 (7th Cir. 2006) (“A
motion to reconsider asks that a decision be reexamined in light of additional legal
arguments, a change of law, or an argument that was overlooked earlier . . . .”).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

08/10/2011
Date: __________________
Distribution:
Eric D. Smith
#112675
Wabash Valley Long Term Segregation
6908 S. Old US Highway 41
Carlisle, IN 47838
Bruce Benjamin Paul
[e-mail]

_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana