ONE NUMBER CORPORATION v. GOOGLE INC.

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to 6/25/2010 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 6/1/2010. (LBK)

Download PDF
Case 1:10-cv-00312-RLY-TAB Document 17-1 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ONE NUMBER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant. ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 1:10-CV-0312RLY-TAB ) ) ) ) ) ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT This matter, having come before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion For A TwentyTwo Day Extension Of Time For Defendant To Answer Or Otherwise Response To Plaintiff's Complaint, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The date for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended by twenty-two (22) days. Defendant's answer or other response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due on or before Friday, June 25, 2010. SO ORDERED. _______________________________ Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana Dated: 06/01/2010 Distribution (by operation of the Court's ECF System): Alastair J. Warr (Counsel for Plaintiff) Dean E. McConnell (Counsel for Plaintiff) Scott S. Morrisson (Counsel for Plaintiff) Bir k K. Billingsley (Counsel for Plaintiff) Todd G. Vare (Counsel for Defendant) Jeff M. Barron (Counsel for Defendant) Jennifer Schuster (Counsel for Defendant)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?