ONE NUMBER CORPORATION v. GOOGLE INC.
Filing
36
ORDER denying 30 Motion for Discovery. However, the Court expects it would allow more narrowly tailored discovery, and counsel shall confer in good faith in an attempt to agree on these parameters. If agreement cannot be reached,counsel shall notify the Magistrate Judge's staff, and this matter will be set for a prompt hearing. Three business days prior to any such hearing Plaintiff shall file any remaining discovery requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/22/2010. (JD)
ONE NUMBER CORPORATION v. GOOGLE INC.
Doc. 36
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
ONE NUMBER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00312-RLY-TAB ) ) ) )
ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff One Number Corporation's motion for leave to take limited expedited written discovery. [Docket No. 30.] Plaintiff's motion is denied. However, the Court expects it would allow more narrowly tailored discovery, and counsel shall confer in good faith in an attempt to agree on these parameters. If agreement cannot be reached, counsel shall notify the Magistrate Judge's staff, and this matter will be set for a prompt hearing. Three business days prior to any such hearing Plaintiff shall file any remaining discovery requests. Dated: 12/22/2010
_______________________________ Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana
Dockets.Justia.com
Copies to: Jeff M. Barron BARNES & THORNBURG LLP jeff.barron@btlaw.com Birk K. Billingsley KRIEG DEVAULT LLP bbillingsley@kdlegal.com Dean E. McConnell KRIEG DEVAULT LLP dmcconnell@kdlegal.com Scott Stuart Morrisson KRIEG DEVAULT LLP smorrisson@kdlegal.com Jennifer Lynn Schuster BARNES & THORNBURG LLP jschuster@btlaw.com Todd G. Vare BARNES & THORNBURG LLP todd.vare@btlaw.com Alastair J. Warr KRIEG DEVAULT LLP awarr@kdlegal.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?