ONE NUMBER CORPORATION v. GOOGLE INC.

Filing 36

ORDER denying 30 Motion for Discovery. However, the Court expects it would allow more narrowly tailored discovery, and counsel shall confer in good faith in an attempt to agree on these parameters. If agreement cannot be reached,counsel shall notify the Magistrate Judge's staff, and this matter will be set for a prompt hearing. Three business days prior to any such hearing Plaintiff shall file any remaining discovery requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/22/2010. (JD)

ONE NUMBER CORPORATION v. GOOGLE INC.

Doc. 36

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

ONE NUMBER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00312-RLY-TAB ) ) ) )

ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff One Number Corporation's motion for leave to take limited expedited written discovery. [Docket No. 30.] Plaintiff's motion is denied. However, the Court expects it would allow more narrowly tailored discovery, and counsel shall confer in good faith in an attempt to agree on these parameters. If agreement cannot be reached, counsel shall notify the Magistrate Judge's staff, and this matter will be set for a prompt hearing. Three business days prior to any such hearing Plaintiff shall file any remaining discovery requests. Dated: 12/22/2010
_______________________________ Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana

Dockets.Justia.com

Copies to: Jeff M. Barron BARNES & THORNBURG LLP [e-mail] Birk K. Billingsley KRIEG DEVAULT LLP [e-mail] Dean E. McConnell KRIEG DEVAULT LLP [e-mail] Scott Stuart Morrisson KRIEG DEVAULT LLP [e-mail] Jennifer Lynn Schuster BARNES & THORNBURG LLP [e-mail] Todd G. Vare BARNES & THORNBURG LLP [e-mail] Alastair J. Warr KRIEG DEVAULT LLP [e-mail]