LEIMKUEHLER v. AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Filing
166
ORDER denying as moot 91 Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class - Court now DENIES AS MOOT given the Court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/5/2012. (JKS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
ROBERT V. LEIMKUEHLER, as trustee and on
behalf of Leimkuehler, Inc., Profit Sharing
Plan,
Plaintiff,
vs.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:10-cv-0333-JMS-TAB
AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
ORDER
Presently before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class, [dkt. 91], which the
Court now DENIES AS MOOT given the Court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the
Defendant. See Lady Di’s, Inc. v. Enhanced Servs. Billing, Inc., 654 F.3d 728, 730 (7th Cir.
2011) (“[B]ecause we reject plaintiff’s theory of the case…, we affirm the district court’s denial
of class certification because common issues do not predominate over individual issues, as required for a class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3).”).
01/05/2012
_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Distribution via ECF only:
Klint L. Bruno
KOREIN TILLERY LLC
kbruno@koreintillery.com
-1-
Amanda C. Couture
DELANEY & DELANEY
acouture@delaneylaw.net
Edward O'Donnell DeLaney
DELANEY & DELANEY LLC
ed@delaneylaw.net
Kathleen Ann DeLaney
DELANEY & DELANEY LLC
kathleen@delaneylaw.net
Joel S. Feldman
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
jfeldman@sidley.com
Bart A. Karwath
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
bart.karwath@btlaw.com
Robert L. King
KOREIN TILLERY, LLC
rking@koreintillery.com
Robert D. MacGill
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
rmacgill@btlaw.com
Eric S. Mattson
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
emattson@sidley.com
Sarah H. Newman
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
snewman@sidley.com
Dennis P. Stolle
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
dstolle@btlaw.com
Eric Hyman Zagrans
eric@zagrans.com
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?