AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. BETTS et al
Filing
64
ENTRY ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT - American Family's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 57 ) is GRANTED. Final judgment will accompany this entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/22/2012. (JD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
COLIN M. BETTS,
JILL BETTS,
USAA,
Defendants.
NO. 1:10-cv-00571-TWP-DKL
ENTRY ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This action relates to the availability of insurance coverage arising out of a car accident.
Plaintiff American Family Mutual Insurance Company (“American Family”) insured a 2003
Kia Spectra owned by non-party Andrew Betts. On October 22, 2007, Defendant Colin Betts was
driving the Kia Spectra with his wife, Defendant Jill Betts, in the passenger seat, when they were
involved in an accident with another vehicle. This accident occurred in Cole, Oklahoma.
Roughly two years after the accident, on October 21, 2009, Jill sued her husband, Colin, in
Oklahoma state court for negligence, seeking damages for bodily injuries.
On May 7, 2010, American Family filed a complaint in this Court for declaratory
judgment against Defendants Colin Betts, Jill Betts, and foreign corporation USAA (collectively,
“Defendants”). According to American Family, its “policy of insurance bars coverage for any
liability claims by Jill Betts against her husband, Colin Betts, as a result of the automobile
accident[.]” (Dkt. 58 at 1). On November 30, 2011, American Family filed a motion for
summary judgment, to which Defendants have failed to respond.
1
The policy of insurance issued by American Family to Andrew Betts provided liability
coverage as follows:
PART I - LIABILITY COVERAGE
You have this coverage if Bodily Injury Liability and
Property Damage Liability coverage is shown in the
declarations. We will pay compensatory damages an
insured person is legally liable for because of bodily
injury and property damage due to the use of a car or
utility trailer. We will defend any suit or settle any claim
for damages payable under this policy as we think proper.
The policy also provided the following definition for “insured person” under liability coverage.
The insured person or insured persons means:
1. You or relative.
2. Any person using your insured car.
3. Any other person or organization. This applies only to
legal liability for acts or omissions of:
a. Any person covered under this Part while using
your insured car.
b. You and any relative covered under this Part
while using any car or utility trailer other than
your insured car. This other car or utility trailer
must not be owned or hired by that person or
organization.
But the following are not insured persons:
1. Any person, other than a relative, using your insured
car without your permission.
2. Any person, other than a relative, using your insured
car with your permission, but who exceeds the scope of
that permission.
3. Any person using a vehicle without the permission of the
person having lawful possession.
4. Any person using a vehicle with the permission of the
person having lawful possession, but who exceeds the
scope of that permission.
Finally, the policy contained the following exclusion:
EXCLUSIONS
This coverage does not apply to:
2
***
10. Bodily injury to:
a. Any person injured while operating your insured
car;
b. You or any person related to you and residing in
your household; or
c. Any person related to the operator and residing in
the household of the operator.
Under the circumstances, Exclusion 10(c) operates to exclude coverage. Colin Betts was
“the operator” of the insured car. The policy excludes bodily injury coverage to“[a]ny person
related to the operator and residing in the household of the operator.” Jill Betts was related to and
lived with Colin. Therefore, as American Family notes, “the policy clearly excludes any liability
coverage for the claims of Jill Betts against her husband and the operator of the vehicle, Colin
Betts.” (Dkt. 58 at 18); see also United Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Steele, 622 N.E.2d 557,
560-61 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993) (holding a household exclusion is not against public policy).
This is consistent with the applicable law and the plain and unambiguous terms of the
policy. As an initial matter, given that this case is based on diversity jurisdiction and Indiana has
the most intimate contacts with the subject of this litigation, the Court must apply Indiana law to
determine whether the exclusion in American Family’s auto policy applies. See Colip v. Clare,
26 F.3d 712, 714 (7th Cir. 1994). Obviously, Defendants do not make a contrary argument.
Under Indiana law, “[i]f the language in the insurance policy is clear and unambiguous, then it
should be given its plain and ordinary meaning[.]”National Athletics Sportswear, Inc. v.
Westfield Ins. Co., 528 F.3d 508, 513 (7th Cir. 2008). Moreover, in order for a policy to be
ambiguous, it must be “susceptible to more than one interpretation and reasonably intelligent
persons would differ as to its meaning.” USA Life One Ins. Co. v. Nuckolls, 682 N.E.2d 534, 538
3
(Ind. 1997). The Court finds that the exclusion at issue unambiguously excludes coverage. This
decision is reinforced by Defendants’ failure to make a contrary argument.
It is well-settled that the interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law
appropriate for summary judgment. National Athletics Sportswear, Inc, 528 F.3d at 512. Because
there are no genuine issues of material fact, American Family’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Dkt. 57) is GRANTED.1 The undisputed evidence establishes that American Family’s
automobile insurance policy excludes liability coverage for Colin Betts for the claims asserted
against him by his wife, Jill Betts. Final judgment will accompany this entry.
SO ORDERED. 06/22/2012
________________________
Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Distribution to:
Robert Scott O'Dell
O'DELL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
rodell@odell-lawfirm.com
Colin M. Betts
2417 W. Bethel Ave., Apt. 15
Muncie, IN 47304
Jill Betts
2417 West Bethel Ave., Apt. 15
Muncie, IN 47304
1
Given the Court’s order, it need not address any of American Family’s alternative arguments.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?