ALGHADBAWI v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al

Filing 24

Entry Discussing F.B.I. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - There is no further action the plaintiff seeks of the F.B.I. defendant in this case. The claim against him is moot. The claim which is moot is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and the F.B.I. defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted to that extent. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/26/2011. (JD)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

JAMIL ALGHADBAWI,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JANET NAPOLITANO, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:10-cv-1330-TWP-DKL

Entry Discussing F.B.I. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
As used in this Entry, the term “F.B.I. defendant” refers to Robert S. Mueller III,
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
The evidentiary record shows without dispute that all F.B.I. background checks
have been conducted and their results forwarded to the appropriate agency. There is no
further action the plaintiff seeks of the F.B.I. defendant in this case. The claim against him
is moot. Forbes v. Trigg, 976 F.2d 308 (7th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 1362
(1993).
The claim which is moot is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and the F.B.I.
defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted to that extent.
No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this
Entry.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:

08/26/2011

Distribution attached.

________________________
Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana

Distribution:
Gisela A. Westwater
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[e-mail]
Jamil Alghadbawi
3722 Montauk Court
Indianapolis, IN 46214