VISTEON CORPORATION et al v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA et al

Filing 42

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge - Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for remand, attorneys fees, and costs 15 is denied, and National Union's motion to realign Heeb as a plaintiff 20 is granted. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 12/5/2011.(MAC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION VISTEON CORPORATION and VISTEON SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY and LOUIS HEEB Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11-cv-0200-RYL-TAB ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation. Parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and any objections, approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for remand, attorney’s fees, and costs [Docket No. 15] is denied, and National Union’s motion to realign Heeb as a plaintiff [Docket No. 20] is granted. Dated: 12/05/2011 _________________________________ RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Copies to: Dean R. Brackenridge FROST BROWN TODD LLC dbrackenridge@fbtlaw.com Nicholas D. Butovich LITCHFIELD CAVO LLP butovich@litchfieldcavo.com Carrie Gibson Doehrmann FROST BROWN TODD LLC cdoehrmann@fbtlaw.com Allison Wells Gritton SPALDING & HILMES, PC awgritton@spaldinglaw.net Timothy F. Jacobs CLAUSEN MILLER, PC tjacobs@clausen.com George M. Plews PLEWS SHADLEY RACHER & BRAUN gplews@psrb.com Peter M. Racher PLEWS SHADLEY RACHER & BRAUN pracher@psrb.com Karen B. Scheidler PLEWS SHADLEY RACHER & BRAUN kscheidler@psrb.com Mark W. Zimmerman CLAUSEN MILLER PC mzimmerman@clausen.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?