VISTEON CORPORATION et al v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA et al
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge - Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for remand, attorneys fees, and costs 15 is denied, and National Union's motion to realign Heeb as a plaintiff 20 is granted. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 12/5/2011.(MAC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
VISTEON CORPORATION and
VISTEON SYSTEMS, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
UNITED STATES FIDELITY &
GUARANTY COMPANY and
LOUIS HEEB
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:11-cv-0200-RYL-TAB
ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation. Parties were afforded
due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections. The Court,
having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and any objections, approves and adopts the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for remand,
attorney’s fees, and costs [Docket No. 15] is denied, and National Union’s motion to realign
Heeb as a plaintiff [Docket No. 20] is granted.
Dated: 12/05/2011
_________________________________
RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Copies to:
Dean R. Brackenridge
FROST BROWN TODD LLC
dbrackenridge@fbtlaw.com
Nicholas D. Butovich
LITCHFIELD CAVO LLP
butovich@litchfieldcavo.com
Carrie Gibson Doehrmann
FROST BROWN TODD LLC
cdoehrmann@fbtlaw.com
Allison Wells Gritton
SPALDING & HILMES, PC
awgritton@spaldinglaw.net
Timothy F. Jacobs
CLAUSEN MILLER, PC
tjacobs@clausen.com
George M. Plews
PLEWS SHADLEY RACHER & BRAUN
gplews@psrb.com
Peter M. Racher
PLEWS SHADLEY RACHER & BRAUN
pracher@psrb.com
Karen B. Scheidler
PLEWS SHADLEY RACHER & BRAUN
kscheidler@psrb.com
Mark W. Zimmerman
CLAUSEN MILLER PC
mzimmerman@clausen.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?