BURTON v. THE CITY OF FRANKLIN et al

Filing 45

ENTRY Concerning Selected Matters - The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is 39 DENIED. The 33 motion to dismiss of defendants the City of Franklin, Mayor Fred L. Paris, and Franklin Police Chief Stan Lynn is fully at issue based on the plaintiff's failure to respond to such motion and the passage of the deadline by which a response by him was to be filed. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/15/2011. (JKS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA THOMAS W. BURTON, Plaintiff, vs. THE CITY OF FRANKLIN, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11-cv-0267-JMS-TAB Entry Concerning Selected Matters The court, having considered the above action and the matters which are pending, makes the following rulings: 1. The plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration [39] is denied. See Patel v. Gonzales 442 F.3d 1011, 1015-1016 (7th Cir. 2006) (“A motion to reconsider asks that a decision be reexamined in light of additional legal arguments, a change of law, or an argument that was overlooked earlier . . . .”). In this instance, due consideration was given to the plaintiff’s claims and the motion to dismiss of defendants Burton and Mears, and the proper ruling was made as to that motion. The portion of the motion for reconsideration in which the possible filing of a supplemental complaint is mentioned is barren of the suggestion of the content of such a document; the court cannot and will not speculate as to such matter. 2. The motion to dismiss of defendants the City of Franklin, Mayor Fred L. Paris, and Franklin Police Chief Stan Lynn is fully at issue based on the plaintiff’s failure to respond to such motion and the passage of the deadline by which a response by him was to be filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11/15/2011 Date: __________________ All Electronically Registered Counsel Thomas W. Burton 67 Sebring Ct. Whiteland, IN 46184 _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?