MENENDEZ v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS

Filing 51

ENTRY - The plaintiff's motion for three judge court has been considered (see Entry). Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for three judge court 48 is DENIED. (copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/18/2011. (JKS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

RACHEL MARIE MENENDEZ,
Plaintiff,
vs.

AARON MCCLELLAN,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:11-cv-00361-JMS-MJD

ENTRY
The plaintiff’s motion for three judge court has been considered.
“A district court of three judges shall be convened when otherwise required by Act
of Congress, or when an action is filed challenging the constitutionality of the
apportionment of congressional districts or the apportionment of any statewide legislative
body.” 28 U.S.C. § 2284(a).
Neither circumstance is presented through the plaintiff’s motion, nor is there any
discernible basis on which such a request could be based, supported or granted.
Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion for three judge court [48] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

08/18/2011
Date: _________________
Distribution:
Rachel Marie Menendez
614 ½ N. Emerson Ave.
Indianapolis, IN 46219
Gregory R. Clark
[e-mail]
Jennifer Lynn Haley
[e-mail]

_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana