WALDEN v. LINC SYSTEMS, INC.
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - No objections having been filed thereto, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [dkt. 34 ] on Defendant Linc System's [sic] Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Bar Plaintiff from Presenting Evidence and Require Plaintiff to Pay Defendant's Attorneys' Fees and Costs [dkt. 26 ], is adopted as the decision and Entry of the Court. Defendant's motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/31/2012. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail)(JKS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA,
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
JASON WALDEN,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
LINC SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
) CAUSE NO. 1:11-cv-388-JMS-DKL
)
)
)
)
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
on
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss etc. [dkt. 26]
No objections having been filed thereto, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation [dkt. 34] on Defendant Linc System’s [sic] Motion to Dismiss or,
Alternatively, to Bar Plaintiff from Presenting Evidence and Require Plaintiff to Pay Defendant’s
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [dkt. 26], is adopted as the decision and Entry of the Court.
Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Date: 08/31/2012
_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Distribution to all ECF-registered counsel of record via e-mail.
Copy by U.S. Mail to:
Jason Walden
2914 Mussman Drive
Indianapolisk, Indiana 46222
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?