BESSONG v. EXCEL, INC.

Filing 69

ORDER denying 65 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Surreply Brief. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/6/2013. (PG)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION KIMBERLY YVONNE BESSONG, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. EXEL, INC., Defendant. 1:11-cv-01239-RLY-DML ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-SURREPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant, Exel, Inc., filed a Motion for Leave to File Sur-Surreply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment. Local Rule 56-1(d) provides, in part, that a surreply may only be filed “if the movant cites new evidence in the reply or objects to the admissibility of the evidence cited in the response.” The court always tries to allow litigants a full and fair opportunity to respond to arguments made by their adversary, including new arguments raised in reply briefs. See e.g., Pike v. Caldera, 188 F.R.D. 519, 535-36 (S.D. Ind. 1999). Yet, the Seventh Circuit has expressed disfavor for surreplies, hinting that courts do not want to be faced with an endless loop of briefs: “There is an inherent tension between a court’s desire to keep briefing of summary judgment motions within reasonable boundaries and a party’s opportunity to be heard on what may be a decisive evidentiary issue.” Smith v. Bray, 681 F.3d 888, 903 (7th Cir. 1 2012). In the present case, the court finds that Plaintiff Bessong has not introduced new arguments or evidence in her surreply that would warrant Exel’s sur-surreply. Exel’s proposed sur-surreply merely extends and reframes arguments previously made in its briefing. The Motion for Leave to File Sur-Surreply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 65) is therefore DENIED. SO ORDERED this 6th day June 2013. __________________________________ _______________ RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE United States District Court United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Southern Districtof Indiana Distributed Electronically to Registered Counsel of Record. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?