CARROLL v. ASTRUE

Filing 46

AMENDED JUDGMENT: The Court, having held oral argument and set forth its ruling on the record [Docket No. 41], enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff Samuel Carroll and against Defendant Michael Astrue. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Court's January 28, 2013, ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 4/29/2013.(SWM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

SAMUEL G. CARROLL,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12-cv-0004-TAB-RLY

AMENDED JUDGMENT
The Court, having held oral argument and set forth its ruling on the record [Docket No.
41], enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff Samuel Carroll and against Defendant Michael Astrue.
Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded under sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Court’s January 28, 2013, ruling.
DATED: 04/29/2013
_______________________________
Tim A. Baker
United States Magistrate Judge
Southern District of Indiana

Copies to:
Lindsay C. Dunn
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
[e-mail]
Thomas E. Kieper
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
[e-mail]
C. David Little
POWER LITTLE & LITTLE
[e-mail]