BILLINGS v. LOYD et al

Filing 8

ENTRY Directing further proceedings. The plaintiff shall have through September 5, 2012, in which to set forth a plausible claim against each of the three defendants. (S.E.) Copy to plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/13/2012.(MAC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
EDDIE HAROLD BILLINGS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DUDLEY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12-cv-1037-JMS-TAB

Entry Directing Further Proceedings
AA complaint must always . . . allege >enough facts to state a claim to relief
that is plausible on its face.’” Limestone Development Corp. v. Village of Lemont, Ill.,
520 F.3d 797, 803 (7th Cir. 2008) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S.
544, 555 (2007)). AA claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual
content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is
liable for the misconduct alleged.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).
The plaintiff shall have through September 5, 2012, in which to set forth a
plausible claim against each of the three defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
08/13/2012
Date: __________________
Distribution:
Eddie Harold Billings, Jr.
403 N. Rural Street
Indianapolis, IN 46201

_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana