WAGNER v. BURNS et al

Filing 41

ENTRY - Plaintiff's voluntary motion to dismiss [dkt. no. 39 ] is DENIED. The plaintiff shall have through February 14, 2014, in which to either 1) file an unconditional motion to dismiss, or 2) state that he will proceed with this action. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/21/2014. Copy Mailed. (JD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION LONNIE WAGNER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BURNS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:12-cv-01879-SEB-DML Entry Discussing Motion to Dismiss The plaintiff wishes to voluntarily dismiss this action without prejudice. He hopes to retain counsel to assist him with this litigation after he is released from prison in six months. Although the defendants do not oppose the motion, the Court notes that the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss appears to have an implied condition which the Court cannot guarantee, i.e.¸ that the plaintiff’s claims, if refiled, would not be barred by the two-year statute of limitations. For this reason, the plaintiff’s voluntary motion to dismiss [dkt. no. 39] is denied. The plaintiff shall have through February 14, 2014, in which to either 1) file an unconditional motion to dismiss, or 2) state that he will proceed with this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. 01/21/2014 Date: __________________ _______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: Lonnie Wagner, 892519. New Castle Correctional Facility, Inmate Mail/Parcels, 1000 Van Nuys Rd., New Castle, IN 47362 All electronically registered counsel

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?