HALL v. HANK

Filing 10

ENTRY - Petitioner Leroy Hall's filing of June 12, 2013 (Dkt. 9 ) is treated as a motion for summary judgment in support of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. As a procedural device, summary judgment is not well-suited in a case. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 9 ) is denied. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/18/2013. Copy Mailed.(JD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION LEROY H. HALL, Petitioner, v. CRAIG HANKS, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:13-cv-357-TWP-MJD ENTRY Petitioner Leroy Hall’ filing of June 12, 2013 (Dkt. 9) is treated as a motion for summary judgment in support of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. As a procedural device, summary judgment is not well-suited in a case such as this, where the pleadings and the expanded record will tell the story. The habeas petition will be resolved, moreover, in accord with the mandate of 28 U.S.C. § 2243—“to dispose of the matter as law and justice require.” See Porter v. McCollum, 130 S. Ct. 447, 452 (2009)(citing Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374, 390 (2005)); Canaan v. McBride, 395 F.3d 376, 383 (7th Cir. 2005); Newell v. Hanks, 283 F.3d 827, 838 (7th Cir. 2002). In addition, respondent has not filed his return to order to show cause and the time for doing so has not passed. Based on all the above circumstances, and noting also that the motion considered herein does not independently establish that the petitioner is “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States,” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a), the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 9) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. 06/18/2013 Date: ___________________ ________________________ Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: Leroy H. Hall No. 854050 PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Inmate Mail/Parcels 4490 West Reformatory Road PENDLETON, IN 46064 Henry.Flores@atg.in.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?