HALL v. HANK
Filing
10
ENTRY - Petitioner Leroy Hall's filing of June 12, 2013 (Dkt. 9 ) is treated as a motion for summary judgment in support of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. As a procedural device, summary judgment is not well-suited in a case. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 9 ) is denied. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/18/2013. Copy Mailed.(JD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
LEROY H. HALL,
Petitioner,
v.
CRAIG HANKS,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:13-cv-357-TWP-MJD
ENTRY
Petitioner Leroy Hall’ filing of June 12, 2013 (Dkt. 9) is treated as a motion for summary
judgment in support of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. As a procedural device, summary
judgment is not well-suited in a case such as this, where the pleadings and the expanded record
will tell the story. The habeas petition will be resolved, moreover, in accord with the mandate of
28 U.S.C. § 2243—“to dispose of the matter as law and justice require.” See Porter v.
McCollum, 130 S. Ct. 447, 452 (2009)(citing Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374, 390 (2005));
Canaan v. McBride, 395 F.3d 376, 383 (7th Cir. 2005); Newell v. Hanks, 283 F.3d 827, 838 (7th
Cir. 2002). In addition, respondent has not filed his return to order to show cause and the time for
doing so has not passed.
Based on all the above circumstances, and noting also that the motion considered herein
does not independently establish that the petitioner is “in custody in violation of the Constitution
or laws or treaties of the United States,” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a), the motion for summary judgment
(Dkt. 9) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
06/18/2013
Date: ___________________
________________________
Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Distribution:
Leroy H. Hall
No. 854050
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Inmate Mail/Parcels
4490 West Reformatory Road
PENDLETON, IN 46064
Henry.Flores@atg.in.gov
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?