HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, THE MAJOR GENERAL EMMETT J. BEAN FEDERAL CENTER DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICES, INDIANAPOLIS

Filing 29

CLOSED JUDGMENT: For the reasons detailed in the Court's order issued this day granting Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss, the Court enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this act ion. The Court concludes that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff Nathaniel A. Higgins' claims against the United States; thus, those claims are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/20/2013.(SWM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
NATHANIEL A. HIGGINS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:13-cv-837-JMS-MJD

FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 58
For the reasons detailed in the Court’s order issued this day granting Defendant United
States of America’s Motion to Dismiss, the Court enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this action.
The Court concludes that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff Nathaniel A. Higgins’
claims against the United States; thus, those claims are DISMISSED.

District Judge:

09/20/2013

_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana

Laura A. Briggs, Clerk
Clerk:
BY: ______________________________
Deputy Clerk, U.S. District Court

Distribution via ECF only:
Jonathan A. Bont
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
[e-mail]
James Gregory Garrison
GARRISON LAW FIRM
[e-mail]
-1-