BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. SC ENTERTAINMENT, LLC et al
Filing
13
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Default Judgment. Defendants are ORDERED to pay sum of $19,644.68 to Plaintiffs plus interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/4/2014. (TMD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC.;
COMART MUSIC;
EMI VIRGIN SONGS, INC. d/b/a EMI
LONGITUDE MUSIC; EMI
BLACKWOOD MUSIC, INC.;
SONG A TRON MUSIC; and
WARNER-TAMBERLANE
PUBLISHING CORP.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
vs.
SC ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, d/b/a BLU,
and SHAWN CANNON, individually,
No. 1:13-cv-01678-RLY-MJD
Defendants.
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”), Comart Music, EMI Virgin Songs, Inc.
d/b/a EMI Longitude Music, EMI Blackwood Music, Inc., Song A Tron Music, and
Warner-Tamberlane Publishing Corp., brought suit against SC Entertainment, LLC, d/b/a
Blu (“Blu”) and Shawn Cannon, the registered agent of Blu with primary responsibility
for the operation of it, for intentional copyright infringement. To date, Defendants have
failed to answer the complaint or submit any type of response in this case. Plaintiffs now
move for an order of default judgment and an award of $15,000 in statutory damages plus
attorney’s fees. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.
1
I.
Background
Plaintiff, BMI, is a “performing rights society” which licenses the right to publicly
perform a repertoire of 7.5 million copyrighted musical composition works on behalf of
the copyright owners of these works. (Complaint ¶ 3, Filing No. 1, at ECF p. 2). The
other Plaintiffs are the copyright owners of the three individual compositions (Last Night
a DJ Saved My Life, Show Me Love, and I’ll Be Around), which are the subject of this
lawsuit from whom BMI has acquired the non-exclusive public performance rights. (Id.
at ¶¶ 4-9, Filing No. 1, at ECF pp. 2-3). BMI enters into blanket license agreements with
music users, such as broadcasters and the owners and operators of concert halls,
restaurants, nightclubs and hotels. (Declaration of Renee S. Wolfe, Attorney, Legal of
BMI (“Wolfe Dec.”) ¶ 3, Filing No. 12-1, at ECF p. 2).
Between June 2011 and June 2013, BMI repeatedly sent letters and made phone
calls to Blu about the need to obtain permission for public performances of the
copyrighted compositions. (Declaration of Lawrence Stevens, Vice President of
Licensing for BMI (“Stevens Dec.”) ¶¶ 5-6, Filing No. 12-2, at ECF p. 3). Blu did not
enter into a blanket license with BMI. (Id. at ¶ 9, Filing No. 12-2, at ECF p. 4). On June
2, 2013, BMI sent Nicole Hillerich to visit Blu and record the music playing. (Id. at ¶ 10,
Filing No. 12-2, at ECF p. 4). The recording revealed that the DJs at Blu played the three
compositions that are the subject of this lawsuit. (Id. at ¶ 11, Filing No. 12-2, at ECF p.
4). BMI sent Blu a letter about Ms. Hillerich’s investigation, and then brought suit
alleging intentional copyright infringement. (Id. at ¶ 12, Filing No. 12-2, at ECF p. 4).
2
Blu and Cannon have not responded to the complaint. The Clerk of Court entered default
on January 9, 2014. (Filing No. 10).
II.
Standard
Once the Clerk enters default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), the court
has the power and discretion to enter a default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 55(b). Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Kovich, No.
2:09-cv-147-PPS-PRC, 2010 WL 1541188, * 1 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 15, 2010) (citing O’Brien
v. R.J. O’Brien & Assocs., Inc., 988 F.2d 1394, 1398 (7th Cir. 1993)). Default judgment
is not entered as a matter of right. See Witzlib v. Cohen, No. 08c0342, 2009 WL
4030485, *1 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 20, 2009). An entry of default judgment “establishes, as a
matter of law, that defendants are liable to plaintiff on each cause of action alleged in the
complaint.” Wehrs v. Wells, 688 F.3d 886, 892 (7th Cir. 2012) (citing United Sates v. Di
Mucci, 879 F.2d 1488, 1497 (7th Cir. 1989).
In determining if default judgment is appropriate, the court should consider such
factors as “the amount of money potentially involved, whether material issues of fact or
issues of substantial public importance are at issue, whether the default is largely
technical, whether plaintiff has been substantially prejudiced by the delay involved and
whether the grounds for default are clearly established or are in doubt.” Id. (citing 10A
C. Wright et. al. Federal Practice and Procedure § 2685 (3d ed. 1998).
III.
Discussion
Considering the above factors, the court finds an entry of default judgment is
appropriate here. However, the well-pled allegations of the complaint relating to the
3
amount of damages suffered ordinarily are not taken as true. See Wehrs, 688 F.3d at 892.
The plaintiff must prove damages. Id.
Plaintiffs seek $15,000 in statutory damages, which amounts to $5,000 per
infringement. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504, the court may award statutory damages “in a
sum of not less than $750 or more than $30,000 as the court considers just.” Here, BMI
states that the estimated license fees between July 2011 and June 2013 would have been
$7,447.95. (Stevens Dec. ¶ 16, Filing No. 12-2, at ECF p. 5). The current annual license
fee would be approximately $3,861.90. (Id., Filing No. 12-2, at ECF p. 5).
Additionally, the cost of the music investigator was $412.55. (Letter to Cannon dated
June 19, 2013, Filing No. 12-2, at ECF p. 41). In further support, BMI relies on several
cases where an amount of $5,000 per infringement was found to be reasonable. The
court agrees that in light of the above actual damages, an award of $15,000 in statutory
damages is just.
Additionally, Plaintiffs seek to recover their attorney’s fees and expenses.
Plaintiffs incurred a flat fee of $4,000 and miscellaneous costs and expenses in the
amount of $644.68. The court finds that these fees are reasonable and should be awarded
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505 to Plaintiffs.
IV.
Conclusion
The court finds that Plaintiffs have proven an award of statutory damages in the
amount of $15,000 is just, and the Plaintiffs are also entitled to recover their attorney’s
fees in the amount of $4,644.68. The court therefore GRANTS the Motion for Default
4
(Filing No. 11). Defendants are ORDERED to pay the sum of $19,644.68 to Plaintiffs
plus interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
SO ORDERED this 4th day of April 2014.
__________________________________
s/ Richard L. Young_______________
RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE
RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE
United States District Court
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Southern District of Indiana
Distributed Electronically to Registered Counsel of Record.
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?