HANKINS v. PAUSZEK

Filing 5

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This claim was severed from case number 1:12-cv-683-TWP-DML. The clerk isdirected to refile Filing No. 83 from 1:12-cv-683-TWP-DML in this action.The clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that Kelly J. Pitcher has appeared as counsel on behalf of Dr. Pauszek. The plaintiff shall have through July 22, 2014, in which to file an amended complaint in this action. **SEE ORDER** Copy mailed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/13/2014. (ADH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION JONATHON MICHAEL HANKINS, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL PAUSZEK Doctor, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:14-cv-00887-TWP-DML ENTRY DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS I. Filing Fee The plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 3] is granted. II. Clerk’s Assistance In this case, plaintiff Jonathon Michael Hankins alleges that defendant Dr. Michael Pauszek allegedly failed to provide constitutionally adequate medical care after admitting Hankins to the Johnson County Memorial Hospital on June 1, 2010. This claim was severed from case number 1:12-cv-683-TWP-DML. The clerk is directed to refile Filing No. 83 from 1:12-cv-683-TWP-DML in this action. The clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that Kelly J. Pitcher has appeared as counsel on behalf of Dr. Pauszek. III. Amended Complaint Required The plaintiff shall have through July 22, 2014, in which to file an amended complaint in this action. The amended complaint must be limited to claims against Dr. Pauszek. No exhibits should be attached. The amended complaint will completely replace and supersede the prior complaints. Massey v. Helman, 196 F.3d 727, 735 (7th Cir. 1999). In submitting an amended complaint, the plaintiff shall conform to the following guidelines: ! ! ! The amended complaint shall comply with the requirement of Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that pleadings contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. . .”; The amended complaint shall comply with the requirement of Rule 10 that the allegations in a complaint be made in numbered paragraphs, each of which should recite, as far as practicable, only a single set of circumstances; and The amended complaint must identify what legal injury he claims to have suffered and what persons are responsible for each such legal injury. The amended complaint will then be screened as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The defendant is not expected to file an answer or to otherwise respond to the amended complaint until after screening has occurred. Counsel will not be recruited to represent Hankins if no viable claim is alleged. IT IS SO ORDERED. 06/13/2014 Date: __________________ Distribution: ________________________ Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana JONATHON MICHAEL HANKINS DOC # 966802 NEW CASTLE - CF NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels 1000 Van Nuys Road NEW CASTLE, IN 47362

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?