PETERSON v. DIETER et al

Filing 11

SCREENING ENTRY TO CORRECT CAPTION AND PROCESS SERVICE - The Court does not view "Security Staff" as a separate defendant and that designation shall be terminated as a defendant. The clerk shall also show No. 1:14-cv-0725-SEB-MJD to be a related case to this case. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue and serve process on the defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the amended complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. Copies Mailed. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/18/2015.(MGG)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION LAWRENCE PETERSON, Plaintiff, vs. MR. DIETER, et. al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:14-cv-00923-TWP-DKL SCREENING ENTRY TO CORRECT CAPTION AND PROCESS SERVICE Plaintiff Lawrence Peterson (“Peterson”) is a convicted offender who was confined at the Duvall Residence Center (“Duvall”) from January 15, 2014 to May 1, 2014. Duvall is a workrelease center in Indianapolis operated under contract with the Indiana Department of Correction (“DOC”). On June 12, 2014 Peterson filed an amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. $ 1983 alleging violations under the Fourteenth Amendment. The defendants sued by Peterson in this civil rights action are each employed at Duvall and each are sued in their individual capacities. An adjustment in the roster of defendants is warranted. The docket generated when this action was received shows “Security Staff” to be a defendant separate from Mr. Gray. The Court reads the complaint and amended complaint as indicating that Mr. Gray is sued as a member of the Security Staff at Duvall. The Court does not view “Security Staff” as a separate defendant and that designation shall be terminated as a defendant. The clerk shall also show No. 1:14-cv-0725SEB-MJD to be a related case to this case. Peterson alleges that while at Duvall he was threatened with discipline if he did not agree to withdraw grievances he had filed about conditions at Duvall and that he was transferred to a regular Indiana prison when he refused to do so. He seeks compensatory and punitive damages. Peterson was a “prisoner” as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h) at the time this action was filed. His amended complaint is therefore subject to the screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Except as specified above concerning the termination of “Security Staff” as a defendant, the action will proceed. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue and serve process on the defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the amended complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 5/18/2015 Distribution: Mr. Dieter, Director Marion County Community Corrections Duvall Work Release Center 1848 Ludlow Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46201 Chris Morrison, Supervisor Marion County Community Corrections Duvall Work Release Center 1848 Ludlow Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46201 Mr. Sandman, Supervisor Marion County Community Corrections Duvall Work Release Center 1848 Ludlow Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46201 Mr. Gray, Security Staff Marion County Community Corrections Duvall Work Release Center 1848 Ludlow Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46201 Becca Remillard, Case Manager Marion County Community Corrections Duvall Work Release Center 1848 Ludlow Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46201 LAWRENCE PETERSON 2720 Anna Lane Indianapolis, IN 46205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?