ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. MIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. OF INDY et al

Filing 39

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CENTRAL ASBESTOS'S MOTION TO DISMISS - On December 21, 2015, the Magistrate Judge submitted and filed her Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 38) on defendant Central Asbestos Service' s motion to dismiss. The parties were afforded the opportunity according to statute and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to file objections to that Report and Recommendation. No party has filed an objection. The Court, having considered the Ma gistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 38) and being duly advised, now APPROVES and ADOPTS it. Defendant Central Asbestos Service's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 18) is therefore DENIED as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/11/2016.(JLS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. MIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. OF INDY, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:15-cv-00046-TWP-DML ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CENTRAL ASBESTOS’S MOTION TO DISMISS On December 21, 2015, the Magistrate Judge submitted and filed her Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 38) on defendant Central Asbestos Service’s motion to dismiss. The parties were afforded the opportunity according to statute and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to file objections to that Report and Recommendation. No party has filed an objection. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 38) and being duly advised, now APPROVES and ADOPTS it. Defendant Central Asbestos Service’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 18) is therefore DENIED as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 1/11/2016 Distribution to electronically registered counsel of record via CM/ECF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?