FLECHSIG v. COLVIN

Filing 23

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 21 Report and Recommendations. The decision of the ALJ is REVERSED and case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/11/2016. (TMD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION SABRINA M. FLECHSIG, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. 1:15-cv-00194-RLY-DKL ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Sabrina M. Flechsig, Plaintiff, filed a request for judicial review of the decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, to deny her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge, who issued her Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge concluded that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred by failing to justify his credibility assessment of Plaintiff and failing to address evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and associated breathing problems. The Magistrate Judge accordingly recommended that the matter be remanded for reconsideration by the ALJ. Neither party objects. Consequently, the court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). 1 After reviewing the record, this court is satisfied that the Magistrate Judge did not commit clear error. Therefore, the court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 21), REVERSES the decision of the ALJ, and REMANDS the matter to the ALJ for further proceedings. SO ORDERED this 11th day of March 2016. __________________________________ RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distributed Electronically to Registered Counsel of Record. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?