TAYLOR v. BUTTS et al

Filing 75

ENTRY Directing Treatment of Filing as a Notice of Appeal - This matter is before the Court on two letters received from plaintiff, pro se. The letter received by the Court on February 8, 2017 does not contain a case number. The Clerk is directe d to docket that letter under this cause of action. The letter from the plaintiff docketed on February 1, 2017 [dkt 74] shall be treated by the clerk as the plaintiff's notice of appeal from the final judgment entered on December 9, 2016. The plaintiff's letter docketed on February 1, 2017 [dkt 74] is treated as a motion to file a late appeal within the grace period described above and sets forth circumstances establishing good cause for the requested extension and as so tr eated the motion to file belated appeal is GRANTED. In addition, the clerk is directed to docket the letter dated February 8, 2017 under this case number. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/17/2017.(JLS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CHARLES MACK TAYLOR, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. HURST c/o, WRIGHT c/o, BIAS c/o, STONE c/o, ALTMAN c/o, LETSTER c/o, Defendants. No. 1:15-cv-00874-TWP-MPB Entry Directing Treatment of Filing as a Notice of Appeal I. This matter is before the Court on two letters received from plaintiff, pro se. The letter received by the Court on February 8, 2017 does not contain a case number. The Clerk is directed to docket that letter under this cause of action. The letter from the plaintiff docketed on February 1, 2017 [dkt 74] shall be treated by the clerk as the plaintiff’s notice of appeal from the final judgment entered on December 9, 2016. II. This action was concluded through the entry of Judgment entered on the clerk’s docket on December 9, 2016. The docket shows that the plaintiff’s copy of this Judgment was returned undelivered. It was undelivered apparently because the plaintiff had been transferred to a different facility. On February 1, 2017, the clerk received from the plaintiff a letter in which the plaintiff states he wishes to appeal. This is the letter treated as a notice of appeal in Part I of this Entry. This letter arrived after the 30-day period in which a notice of appeal would otherwise have been timely. The letter also arrived within the 30-day grace period recognized by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5), pursuant to which the district court may extend the time to file notice of appeal if a party so moves no later than thirty days after the original deadline for the filing of notice of appeal and that party shows “excusable neglect or good cause.” The advisory committee notes to the 2002 amendments state that Rule 4(a)(5)(A)(ii) was amended to correct the misunderstanding of the Rule that separate standards applied based on when the motion was filed. They do not. The advisory committee note explains that “[t]he good cause and excusable neglect standards have ‘different domains.’” Id. (quoting Lorenzen v. Emp. Ret. Plan, 896 F.2d 228, 232 (7th Cir. 1990)). The relevant question is one of fault, as “[t]he excusable neglect standard applies in situations in which there is fault; in such situations, the need for extension is usually occasioned by something within the control of the movant.” Id. On the other hand, the good cause standard “applies in situations in which there is no fault—excusable or otherwise.” Id. CONCLUSION The plaintiff’s letter docketed on February 1, 2017 [dkt 74] is treated as a motion to file a late appeal within the grace period described above and sets forth circumstances establishing good cause for the requested extension and as so treated the motion to file belated appeal is GRANTED. In addition, the clerk is directed to docket the letter dated February 8, 2017 under this case number. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 2/17/2017 Distribution: Adam Garth Forrest BOSTON BEVER KLINGE CROSS & CHIDESTER aforrest@bbkcc.com CHARLES MACK TAYLOR 994511 WABASH VALLEY - CF WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels 6908 S. Old US Hwy 41 P.O. Box 1111 CARLISLE, IN 47838

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?