TAYLOR v. BUTTS et al
Filing
75
ENTRY Directing Treatment of Filing as a Notice of Appeal - This matter is before the Court on two letters received from plaintiff, pro se. The letter received by the Court on February 8, 2017 does not contain a case number. The Clerk is directe d to docket that letter under this cause of action. The letter from the plaintiff docketed on February 1, 2017 [dkt 74] shall be treated by the clerk as the plaintiff's notice of appeal from the final judgment entered on December 9, 2016. The plaintiff's letter docketed on February 1, 2017 [dkt 74] is treated as a motion to file a late appeal within the grace period described above and sets forth circumstances establishing good cause for the requested extension and as so tr eated the motion to file belated appeal is GRANTED. In addition, the clerk is directed to docket the letter dated February 8, 2017 under this case number. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/17/2017.(JLS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
HURST c/o,
WRIGHT c/o,
BIAS c/o,
STONE c/o,
ALTMAN c/o,
LETSTER c/o,
Defendants.
No. 1:15-cv-00874-TWP-MPB
Entry Directing Treatment of Filing as a Notice of Appeal
I.
This matter is before the Court on two letters received from plaintiff, pro se. The letter
received by the Court on February 8, 2017 does not contain a case number. The Clerk is directed
to docket that letter under this cause of action. The letter from the plaintiff docketed on February
1, 2017 [dkt 74] shall be treated by the clerk as the plaintiff’s notice of appeal from the final
judgment entered on December 9, 2016.
II.
This action was concluded through the entry of Judgment entered on the clerk’s docket on
December 9, 2016. The docket shows that the plaintiff’s copy of this Judgment was returned
undelivered. It was undelivered apparently because the plaintiff had been transferred to a different
facility.
On February 1, 2017, the clerk received from the plaintiff a letter in which the plaintiff
states he wishes to appeal. This is the letter treated as a notice of appeal in Part I of this Entry. This
letter arrived after the 30-day period in which a notice of appeal would otherwise have been timely.
The letter also arrived within the 30-day grace period recognized by Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedure 4(a)(5), pursuant to which the district court may extend the time to file notice of appeal
if a party so moves no later than thirty days after the original deadline for the filing of notice of
appeal and that party shows “excusable neglect or good cause.” The advisory committee notes to
the 2002 amendments state that Rule 4(a)(5)(A)(ii) was amended to correct the misunderstanding
of the Rule that separate standards applied based on when the motion was filed. They do not. The
advisory committee note explains that “[t]he good cause and excusable neglect standards have
‘different domains.’” Id. (quoting Lorenzen v. Emp. Ret. Plan, 896 F.2d 228, 232 (7th Cir. 1990)).
The relevant question is one of fault, as “[t]he excusable neglect standard applies in situations in
which there is fault; in such situations, the need for extension is usually occasioned by something
within the control of the movant.” Id. On the other hand, the good cause standard “applies in
situations in which there is no fault—excusable or otherwise.” Id.
CONCLUSION
The plaintiff’s letter docketed on February 1, 2017 [dkt 74] is treated as a motion to file a
late appeal within the grace period described above and sets forth circumstances establishing good
cause for the requested extension and as so treated the motion to file belated appeal is GRANTED.
In addition, the clerk is directed to docket the letter dated February 8, 2017 under this case
number.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 2/17/2017
Distribution:
Adam Garth Forrest
BOSTON BEVER KLINGE CROSS & CHIDESTER
aforrest@bbkcc.com
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
994511
WABASH VALLEY - CF
WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels
6908 S. Old US Hwy 41
P.O. Box 1111
CARLISLE, IN 47838
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?