MIMMS ET AL. v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.

Filing 280

ENTRY ON PARTIES' OBJECTIONS TO THE VIDEO TRIAL DEPOSITION OF CLINT THOMAS - On March 24, 2017, the parties filed designations and objections to the video trial deposition of Clint Thomas. (Filing No. 270 .) Plaintiff Anthony Mimms ("Dr. M imms") objected to six portions of the video deposition and Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. ("CVS") objected to one portion. Accordingly, the sustained portions of the deposition should be stricken from the video. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/28/2017.(JLS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ANTHONY MIMMS, M.D., Plaintiff, v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. a Rhode Island corporation, Defendant. ______________________________________ INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, Interested Partys. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:15-cv-00970-TWP-MJD ENTRY ON PARTIES’ OBJECTIONS TO THE VIDEO TRIAL DEPOSITION OF CLINT THOMAS On March 24, 2017, the parties filed designations and objections to the video trial deposition of Clint Thomas. (Filing No. 270 .) Plaintiff Anthony Mimms (“Dr. Mimms”) objected to six portions of the video deposition and Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (“CVS”) objected to one portion. The Court makes the following rulings: • CVS’s objection to section 85:21-90:18 is overruled. CVS objection goes to the weight, not the admissibility of this evidence. • Dr. Mimms’ objections with respect to sections 107:25-108:8, is overruled. • Dr. Mimms objection with respect to section 112:23-114:1, is overruled to the extent the designated testimony refers to years 2013 through 2015. • Dr. Mimms’ objection to sections 118:22-123:14, is sustained. • Dr. Mimms’ objections with respect to sections 127:16-17 is overruled. • Dr. Mimms’ objections with respect to sections 128:25-129:1-7 is sustained; with respect to sections 129:8-15, the objection is overruled. • Dr. Mimms’ objections with respect to sections 132:3-9 is sustained. Accordingly, the sustained portions of the deposition should be stricken from the video. SO ORDERED. Date: 3/28/2017 Distribution: Jason D. May jason.may@jasonmaylaw.com Dennis P. Stolle BARNES & THORNBURG LLP (Indianapolis) dstolle@btlaw.com Amanda L.B. Mulroony HOOVER HULL TURNER LLP amulroony@hooverhullturner.com Jonathan W. Garlough FOLEY & LARDNER LLP jgarlough@foley.com Andrew W. Hull HOOVER HULL TURNER LLP awhull@hooverhullturner.com Robert H. Griffith FOLEY & LARDNER LLP rgriffith@foley.com Ryan Edwin Galloway LAW OFFICE OF JASON D. MAY ryan.galloway@jasonmaylaw.com Alice McKenzie Morical HOOVER HULL TURNER LLP amorical@hooverhullturner.com Stephanie Michelle Payne LAW OFFICE OF JASON D. MAY, LLC spayne@jasonmaylaw.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?