MARTIN v. MAURER

Filing 51

ORDER adopting 44 Report and Recommendations and granting Defendant's 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/6/2016. (TMD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION AMY D. MARTIN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. BETSY MAURER, Defendant. 1:15-cv-01471-RLY-MJD ORDER ON THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Amy D. Martin, Plaintiff, filed this action for fraud against her former sister-in law Betsy Maurer, Defendant. Plaintiff alleges Defendant made a material misrepresentation regarding her brother’s assets just prior to Plaintiff signing her divorce settlement agreement. Plaintiff claims she justifiably relied upon that representation and was damaged as a result because she accepted less property in the divorce than she would have otherwise been entitled to receive. Defendant removed this case from the Hamilton Superior Court and subsequently filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). The court referred the motion to the Magistrate Judge, who issued his Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this court grant Defendant’s motion. No party objects. Consequently, the court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). After reviewing the record, the Report and Recommendation, and the 1 relevant case law, this court is satisfied that the Magistrate Judge did not commit clear error. Therefore, the court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 44). Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Filing No. 12) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED for want of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). SO ORDERED this 6th day of June 2016. __________________________________ RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distributed Electronically to Registered Counsel of Record. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?