SAWYER et al v. MATTHEWS et al

Filing 38

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 36) and being duly advised, now APPROVES and ADOPTS it. Defendants David Matthews, Lizzy Santiago, Matthews & Associates, and Julie Rhoades's motion to dismiss Dkt. 17 is therefore DENIED as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/22/2016. Copies Mailed(CKM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION DONNELL SAWYER, Plaintiff, vs. DAVID P. MATTHEWS, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:15-cv-01541-SEB-DML Order Approving and Adopting Report and Recommendation on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss On July 29, 2016, the Magistrate Judge submitted and filed her Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 36) on defendants David Matthews, Lizzy Santiago, Matthews & Associates, and Julie Rhoades’s motion to dismiss. The parties were afforded the opportunity according to statute and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to file objections to that Report and Recommendation. No party has filed an objection. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 36) and being duly advised, now APPROVES and ADOPTS it. Defendants David Matthews, Lizzy Santiago, Matthews & Associates, and Julie Rhoades’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 17) is therefore DENIED as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: _______________________ 8/22/2016 Distribution: All ECF-registered counsel of record via email generated by the court’s ECF system Via first-class U.S. mail: DONNELL SAWYER 1909 Tee Dee Street Raleigh, NC 27610 LIZZY SANTIAGO JULIE RHOADES 2905 Sackett Street Houston, TX 77098 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?