PARKS v. KNIGHT

Filing 40

ENTRY DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL - Accordingly, his appeal is not taken in good faith, and for this reason his request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [dkt. 38 ] is denied. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/22/2017. (JLS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION WARREN PARKS, Petitioner, vs. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) Case No 1:15-cv-1856-TWP-DML ) ) ) ) Entry Denying Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal The petitioner seeks leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of the appellate fees of $505.00. An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915; see Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). "Good faith" within the meaning of § 1915 must be judged by an objective, not a subjective, standard. See id. There is no objectively reasonable argument the petitioner could present to argue that the disposition of this action was erroneous. Additionally, final judgment was entered in this action on September 22, 2016, making this notice of appeal untimely. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). In pursuing an appeal, therefore, the petitioner “is acting in bad faith . . . [because] to sue in bad faith means merely to sue on the basis of a frivolous claim, which is to say a claim that no reasonable person could suppose to have any merit.” Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, his appeal is not taken in good faith, and for this reason his request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [dkt. 38] is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 3/22/2017 Electronic distribution to counsel of record via CM/ECF and to: WARREN PARKS 116977 PENDLETON - CIF CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY Electronic Service Participant - Court only

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?