ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MK CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al

Filing 53

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on the Plaintiff's Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default as to Matthew Cline [Dkt. 41] and Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default as to MK Construction, LLC [Dkt. 42.]. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. [Dkt. 47.] The Clerk is directed to enter default against Matthew Cline and MK Construction, LLC as of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/13/2016.(JLS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. MK CONSTRUCTION, LLC, MATTHEW CLINE, ALLIED DIVERSIFIED CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:16-cv-00582-TWP-MJD ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default as to Matthew Cline [Dkt. 41] and Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default as to MK Construction, LLC [Dkt. 42.]. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. [Dkt. 47.] The Clerk is directed to enter default against Matthew Cline and MK Construction, LLC as of the date of this Order. Date: 10/13/2016 Distribution: Steven C. Coffaro KEATING MUETHING & KLEKAMP scoffaro@kmklaw.com Michael Robert Giordano LEWIS WAGNER LLP mgiordano@lewiswagner.com Richard K. Shoultz LEWIS WAGNER LLP rshoultz@lewiswagner.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?