J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. BARRERA et al
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 18 -The plaintiff's claims against defendants BENITO BRITO FLORES and REST MEX, INC. are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The plaintiff must take action on its claims against defendant Samuel Barrera. If it intends to seek an entry of default under Rule55(a), it should do so promptly. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/6/2017.(CBU)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMUEL BARRERA, individually and
d/b/a TAQUERIA JALISCO,
BENITO BRITO FLORES, individually
and d/b/a TAQUERIA JALISCO, and
REST MEX, INC. d/b/a TAQUERIA
JALISCO,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:16-cv-00970-SEB-DML
Order Approving and Adopting Report and Recommendation on
Dismissal of Certain Defendants under Rule 4(m)
On December 16, 2016, the Magistrate Judge submitted and filed her Report
and Recommendation (Dkt. 18) that the plaintiff’s claims against defendants Benito
Brito Flores and Rest Mex, Inc. should be dismissed without prejudice under Rule
4(m). The parties were afforded the opportunity according to statute and the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to file objections to that Report and
Recommendation. No party has filed an objection. The Court, having considered
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 18) and being duly
advised, now APPROVES and ADOPTS it.
The plaintiff’s claims against defendants Benito Brito Flores and Rest Mex,
Inc. are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The plaintiff must take action on its claims against defendant Samuel
Barrera. If it intends to seek an entry of default under Rule 55(a), it should do so
promptly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: _______________________
1/6/2017
Distribution:
All ECF-registered counsel of record via email generated by the court’s ECF system
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?