HOOPER v. MOSIER et al
Filing
22
ORDER ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DIRECTING DEFENDANT THE FINER DETAILS, LLC TO SHOW CAUSE - The Plaintiff's Application for Clerk's Entry of Default (Filing No. 14) is DENIED IN PART (as to defendant Ken Mosier) AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISE MENT IN PART (as to defendant The Fine Details, LLC). **SEE ORDER** Copy to Defendant's via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/20/2016. (JLS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
JACK HOOPER,
Plaintiff,
vs.
KEN MOSIER and
THE FINER DETAILS LLC,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:16-cv-01385-TWP-DML
ORDER ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND
DIRECTING DEFENDANT THE FINER DETAILS, LLC TO SHOW CAUSE
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Application for Clerk’s Entry of Default
against both defendants, Ken Mosier and The Finer Details, LLC. The Court finds that a clerk’s
entry of default is not warranted as to defendant Ken Mosier. The Court requires defendant The
Finer Details, LLC to show cause why an entry of default should not be made against it.
A. Defendant Ken Mosier
Defendant Ken Mosier, acting pro se, filed an Answer to Complaint on July 25, 2016.
Default is an extreme remedy which should be given only when absolutely necessary. “In
considering whether to grant default, courts may look to a number of factors including ‘the nature
of the default, prejudice to the plaintiff, and whether the delay is excusable.’” Best Chairs, Inc. v.
Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC, No. 3:14-CV-00067-RLY, 2015 WL 4641698, at *3 (S.D. Ind.
Aug. 4, 2015). The Court, having reviewed the Plaintiff’s Application and noting that an answer
was filed by Ken Mosier on July 25, 2016 (about 30 days after the Plaintiff served his Amended
Complaint), finds that a clerk’s entry of default is not warranted for Ken Mosier.
B. Defendant The Finer Details, LLC
Defendant The Finer Details, LLC has not appeared in this case or filed an answer. The
Answer to Complaint filed by Ken Mosier cannot be considered an answer filed by The Finer
Details, LLC. The Finer Details, LLC cannot represent itself. As an entity and not a human being,
it may only defend a case through an attorney. E.g., In re IFC Credit Corp., 663 F.3d 315, 318
(7th Cir. 2011). The Court ORDERS The Finer Details, LLC to appear by counsel and to show
cause, in writing, by October 4, 2016, why an entry of default should not be made against it.
Conclusion
The Plaintiff’s Application for Clerk’s Entry of Default (Filing No. 14) is DENIED IN
PART (as to defendant Ken Mosier) AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT IN PART (as to
defendant The Fine Details, LLC).
SO ORDERED.
Date: 9/20/2016
Distribution:
All ECF-registered counsel of record by email through the court’s ECF system
Service by first class U.S. mail on:
Ken Mosier
121 Commerce Drive, Suite 102
Danville, IN 46122
Ken Mosier
1447 Janetta Ct.
Danville, IN 46122
The Finer Details, LLC
2001 E. Main Street
Danville, IN 46122
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?