LESER v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al

Filing 233

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge submitted her Report and Recommendation on Sanctions (Dkt. 227 ).The Plaintiff's Request for Sanctions (Dkt. 151 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Plaintiff, pursua nt to Rule 37(c)(1)(A), should be awarded her reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in having to brief and catalog the privilege log issues between the time period of March 19, 2019 and April 2, 2019, as detailed in the Report and Recommendation. These fees and expenses should not include the costs associated with bringing Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Dkt. 151 ) or preparing for oral argument on April 8, 2019. The Plaintiff should file a motion with this Court outlining her attorney time and fees and any other expenses incurred, along with any justification for the reasonableness of the monetary calculation. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/30/2019. (NAD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION DEBORAH L LESER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ) BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS FOR ) THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ) MARY ANN SULLIVAN Individually and in her ) Official Capacity, ) SAM ODLE Individually and in his Official ) Capacity, ) LANIER ECHOLS Individually and in her ) Official Capacity, ) MICHAEL O'CONNOR Individually and in his ) Official Capacity, ) GAYLE COSBY Individually and in her Official ) Capacity, ) KELLY BENTLEY Individually and in her ) Official Capacity, ) DIANE ARNOLD Individually and in her Official ) Capacity, ) LEWIS D. FEREBEE, ) LE BOLER, ) WANDA LEGRAND, ) LELA TINA HESTER, ) ) Defendants. ) No. 1:16-cv-02044-TWP-DLP ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Magistrate Judge submitted her Report and Recommendation on Sanctions (Dkt. 227). The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff’s Request for Sanctions (Dkt. 151) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 37(c)(1)(A), should be awarded her reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in having to brief and catalog the privilege log issues between the time period of March 19, 2019 and April 2, 2019, as detailed in the Report and Recommendation. These fees and expenses should not include the costs associated with bringing Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. 151) or preparing for oral argument on April 8, 2019. The Plaintiff should file a motion with this Court outlining her attorney time and fees and any other expenses incurred, along with any justification for the reasonableness of the monetary calculation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 5/30/2019 Distribution: Kevin W. Betz BETZ & BLEVINS kbetz@betzadvocates.com Sandra L. Blevins BETZ & ASSOCIATES sblevins@betzadvocates.com Ellen E. Boshkoff FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP (Indianapolis) ellen.boshkoff@faegrebd.com Sarah V. Bowers FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP (Indianapolis) sarah.bowers@faegrebd.com Jamie A. Maddox BETZ & ASSOCIATES jmaddox@betzadvocates.com Jonathan Lamont Mayes BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS, LLP jmayes@boselaw.com Andrew M. McNeil BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS, LLP amcneil@boselaw.com Alexander Edward Preller FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP (Indianapolis) alex.preller@faegrebd.com Howard L. Stevenson STEVENSON LEGAL GROUP, LLP hstevenson@csmlegal.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?