MARTIG v. SPEEDWAY LLC

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS MOOT - On December 9, 2016, the Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation which recommended dismissal of this action. The parties were afforded due opp ortunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A final judgment shall issue. Additionally, Attorney John Seib's Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel (Dkt. 14 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Attorney Seib is ordered to provide plaintiff with a copy of this Order and the Judgment. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/12/2017. Copy to John Seib via U.S. Mail. (JLS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION DANIEL MARTIG, Plaintiff, vs. SPEEDWAY LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:16-cv-02347-TWP-MPB ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS MOOT On December 9, 2016, the Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation which recommended dismissal of this action. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A final judgment shall issue. Additionally, Attorney John Seib’s Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel (Dkt. 14) is DENIED AS MOOT. Attorney Seib is ordered to provide plaintiff with a copy of this Order and the Judgment. Date: 1/12/2017 Distribution: John P. Seib 10566 Greenway Drive Fishers, IN 46037 Thomas L. Davis FROST BROWN TODD LLC tdavis@fbtlaw.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?