WESTBROOK v. BRIDGES COMMUNITY SERVICES et al

Filing 17

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS - The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 15 ) and being duly advised, now APPROVES and ADOPTS it. T he defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 11 ) is therefore DENIED as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. Within 21 days of this Court's order, Mr. Westbrook must file a More Definite Statement, which identifies (1) t he nature of the disability, or perceived disability, supporting his claim that the defendant discriminated against him based on that disability; (2) the dates and types of alleged adverse employment actions taken by the defendant because of the disability; and (3) the dates and types of alleged adverse employment actions taken by the defendant because of his sex. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/11/2017.(JLS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
CURTIS L. WESTBROOK,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BRIDGES COMMUNITY SERVICES,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:16-cv-02913-TWP-DML

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ON THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
On April 24, 2017, the Magistrate Judge submitted and filed her Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. 15) on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The parties were afforded the
opportunity according to statute and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to file objections to that
Report and Recommendation. No party has filed an objection. The Court, having considered the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 15) and being duly advised, now
APPROVES and ADOPTS it. The defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 11) is therefore DENIED
as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. Within 21 days of this Court’s
order, Mr. Westbrook must file a More Definite Statement, which identifies (1) the nature of the
disability, or perceived disability, supporting his claim that the defendant discriminated against
him based on that disability; (2) the dates and types of alleged adverse employment actions taken
by the defendant because of the disability; and (3) the dates and types of alleged adverse
employment actions taken by the defendant because of his sex.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 5/11/2017

Distribution:
All ECF-registered counsel of record via email generated by the court’s ECF system
Via first-class U.S. mail:
CURTIS L. WESTBROOK
1113 East 6th Street
Muncie, IN 47302

2