RACKEMANN v. LISNR, INC. et al
Filing
289
ORDER ADOPTING 254 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 193 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by ALAN RACKEMANN. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike or Dismiss Counterclaims (Dkt. 193 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/21/2018.(LBT)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
ALAN RACKEMANN,
Plaintiff,
v.
LISNR, INC., et al.
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:17-cv-00624-TWP-MJD
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 254] on Plaintiff’s
Motion to Strike or Dismiss Counterclaims [Dkt. 193]. The parties were afforded due opportunity
pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having
considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike or Dismiss Counterclaims [Dkt.
193] is DENIED as MOOT.
Date: 3/21/2018
Distribution:
Rafey S. Balabanian
EDELSON PC
rbalabanian@edelson.com
Kevin Kelly
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
kkelly@cov.com
Thomas A. Barnard
TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP
tbarnard@taftlaw.com
John F. McCauley
BINGHAM GREENEBAUM DOLL LLP
(Indianapolis)
jmccauley@bgdlegal.com
David J. Bender
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
dbender@cov.com
Eric C. Bosset
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
ebosset@cov.com
Thomas L. Feher
THOMPSON HINE LLP (Cleveland)
tom.feher@thompsonhine.com
Katharine Goodloe
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
kgoodloe@cov.com
Jesse Jenike-Godshalk
THOMSPON HINE LLP
Jesse.JenikeGodshalk@ThompsonHine.com
Erica C Mirabella
132 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02116
Eve-Lynn Rapp
EDELSON PC
erapp@edelson.com
Benjamin H. Richman
EDELSON PC
brichman@edelson.com
Benjamin Thomassen
EDELSON PC
bthomassen@edelson.com
David O. Tittle
BINGHAM GREENEBAUM DOLL LLP
(Indianapolis)
dtittle@bgdlegal.com
Thomas F. Zych
THOMPSON HINE LLP
tom.zych@thompsonhine.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?