HINDMAN v. SUPERINTENDENT

Filing 17

Entry and Order Dismissing Action - The petition for writ of habeas corpus of Sean Hindman challenging the validity of the prison disciplinary proceeding No. IYC 17-01-217 is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The reasons for this ruling are that (1) the expanded record shows that all the procedural requirements of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557 (1974), were supplied, and (2) the decision itself was supported by at least "some evidence" as required by Superintend., Mass. Corr. Inst. v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454 (1985). Hindman has not shown or even argued otherwise. (Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 8/16/2017.(JDC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

SEAN HINDMAN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
vs.
SUPERINTENDENT,
Respondent.

No. 1:17-cv-888-WTL-TAB

Entry and Order Dismissing Action
I.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus of Sean Hindman challenging the validity of the
prison disciplinary proceeding No. IYC 17-01-217 is denied and this action is dismissed with
prejudice. The reasons for this ruling are that (1) the expanded record shows that all the procedural
requirements of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557 (1974), were supplied, and (2) the decision
itself was supported by at least “some evidence” as required by Superintend., Mass. Corr. Inst. v.
Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454 (1985). Hindman has not shown or even argued otherwise.
II.
Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 08/16/2017
_______________________________
Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana

Distribution:
SEAN HINDMAN
243423
PLAINFIELD - CF
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Inmate Mail/Parcels
727 MOON ROAD
PLAINFIELD, IN 46168
Abigail T. Rom
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
[e-mail]