EISEMAN v. KNIGHT
Entry Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - 13 Motion to Dismiss is granted. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/28/2017. (MEJ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
) Case No. 1:17-cv-1062-TWP-DML
Entry Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment
James Eiseman brings this action for habeas corpus relief challenging the validity of a
disciplinary proceeding identified as No. CIC 16-11-0190. Through an administrative order, the
challenged proceeding has been dismissed. This development removes the “case or controversy”
from the action, which must therefore be dismissed as moot. As dismissal for mootness is a
dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. The respondent’s motion to dismiss on that basis Dkt.  is
Judgment consistent with this Entry will issue in a separate order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Electronic distribution to counsel of record via CM/ECF and by U.S. mail to:
PENDLETON - CIF
CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY
Electronic Service Participant - Court only
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?