CASPER v. KNIGHT

Filing 13

Entry and Order Dismissing Action - In a prison disciplinary proceeding identified as No. CIC 17-01-0276, the petitioner was found guilty of attempted escape and was sanctioned. Those charges have since been reduced and the sanctions affecting the duration of the petitioner's incarceration have been vacated and the deprived credit time has been returned to the petitioner. [dkt. 9 -1]. The respondent argues that this action is now moot and must be dismissed. The petitioner did not fil e a response despite seeking an extension of time to do so. Because there is no sanction affecting the fact or duration of confinement in this case, the petition must be dismissed as moot. The respondent's motion to dismiss, dkt. 9 , is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (Copy to Petitioner via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/3/2017. (APD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION MARK CASPER, Petitioner, v. RICHARD BROWN, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01405-JMS-MJD ) ) ) ) Entry and Order Dismissing Action In a prison disciplinary proceeding identified as No. CIC 17-01-0276, the petitioner was found guilty of attempted escape and was sanctioned. Those charges have since been reduced and the sanctions affecting the duration of the petitioner’s incarceration have been vacated and the deprived credit time has been returned to the petitioner. [dkt. 9-1]. The respondent argues that this action is now moot and must be dismissed. The petitioner did not file a response despite seeking an extension of time to do so. Discussion A case becomes moot, and the federal courts lose subject matter jurisdiction, when a justiciable controversy ceases to exist between the parties. See Church of Scientology of Cal. v. United States, 506 U.S. 9, 12 (1992) (“if an event occurs while a case is pending . . . that makes it impossible for the court to grant ‘any effectual relief whatever’ to a prevailing party, the [case] must be dismissed.”) (quoting Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651, 653 (1895)); Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 317 (1988) (grounding mootness doctrine in the Constitution’s Article III requirement that courts adjudicate only “actual, ongoing cases or controversies”). “A case is moot when issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 287 (2000) (internal citations omitted). In this case, the disciplinary proceedings associated with No. CIC 17-01-0276 were reduced and the deprived time was returned to the petitioner. [dkt. 9-1]. These developments render the action moot. Conclusion Because there is no sanction affecting the fact or duration of confinement in this case, the petition must be dismissed as moot. The respondent’s motion to dismiss, dkt. [9], is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 8/3/2017 Distribution: MARK CASPER 115399 WABASH VALLEY - CF WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels 6908 S. Old US Hwy 41 P.O. Box 1111 CARLISLE, IN 47838 Aaron T. Craft INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL aaron.craft@atg.in.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?