HUDSON v. SUPERINTENDENT

Filing 20

ENTRY - Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Directing Entry of Final Judgment ; There was no arbitrary action in any aspect of the charge, disciplinary proceedings, or sanctions involved in the events identified in this action, and there was no constitutional infirmity in the proceeding which entitles Hudson to the relief he seeks. Hudson's petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be denied and the action dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/6/2018.(CKM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION EDDIE R. HUDSON, ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-cv-1821-SEB-MJD ) ) ) ) Petitioner, vs. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent. FINAL JUDGMENT The Court having this day directed the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of the respondent and against the petitioner, Eddie Hudson. Hudson’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. 3/6/2018 Date: ________________ _______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: EDDIE R. HUDSON 258703 PLAINFIELD - CF PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Electronic Service Participant – Court Only Marjorie H. Lawyer-Smith INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL marjorie.lawyer-smith@atg.in.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?