HUDSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
Filing
20
ENTRY - Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Directing Entry of Final Judgment ; There was no arbitrary action in any aspect of the charge, disciplinary proceedings, or sanctions involved in the events identified in this action, and there was no constitutional infirmity in the proceeding which entitles Hudson to the relief he seeks. Hudson's petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be denied and the action dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/6/2018.(CKM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
EDDIE R. HUDSON,
)
)
)
)
) Case No. 1:17-cv-1821-SEB-MJD
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
vs.
SUPERINTENDENT,
Respondent.
FINAL JUDGMENT
The Court having this day directed the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of the respondent and against the petitioner, Eddie Hudson.
Hudson’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is dismissed with
prejudice.
3/6/2018
Date: ________________
_______________________________
SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Distribution:
EDDIE R. HUDSON
258703
PLAINFIELD - CF
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Electronic Service Participant – Court Only
Marjorie H. Lawyer-Smith
INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
marjorie.lawyer-smith@atg.in.gov
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?