TAYLOR v. GRAY et al

Filing 8

Entry Dismissing Action And Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Accordingly, for the reasons explained in the Entry of July 24, 2017, dkt. 7, this action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Final judgment shall now enter. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/19/2017. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MEJ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ARCHIE J. TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. L. GRAY, C. MILLER, D. DAVIS, and J. SHAVER Lt., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:17-cv-02439-TWP-DML Entry Dismissing Action And Directing Entry of Final Judgment Plaintiff, an Indiana prisoner, commenced this action on July 19, 2017, asserting claims for missing personal property against four correctional officers. The complaint was screened on July 24, 2017, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Finding that the complaint presented no viable federal civil rights or statutory claim, it was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See dkt. 7. Plaintiff’s state law claim was not allowed to proceed on a supplemental jurisdiction basis because there was no federal claim present. Id. Finally, diversity jurisdiction did not exist. Id. Plaintiff was allowed an opportunity to show cause, no later than August 28, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the show cause opportunity. Accordingly, for the reasons explained in the Entry of July 24, 2017, dkt. 7, this action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Final judgment shall now enter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 9/19/2017 Distribution: Archie J. Taylor 120690 Pendleton Correctional Facility Electronic Service Participant – Court Only

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?