COBB v. ROSELL et al
Filing
9
ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. This action shall proceed with (1) Eighth Amendment medical claims against Defendants Talbot, Ivers, Bergeson, Wambri, Bradley, Davis, McAbee, Bagienski, Shelby, Perry, and Merondet; (2) First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Davis, Bagienski, and Talbot; and (3) an Eighth Amendment policy-or-practice claim against Wexford. This summary of claims includes all viable claims identified by the Court. If Mr. Cobb belie ves that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court, he shall have through September 17, 2018, in which to identify those claims. The clerk is designated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) to issue process to Defendants (1) Wexford Health; (2) Dr. Paul Talbot; (3) LeeAnn Ivers; (4) Lisa Bergeson; (5) Jane Wambri; (6) Genifer Bradley; (7) Becky Davis; (8) Samantha McAbee; (9) Melissa Bagienski; (10) Shawna Shelby; (11) Dr. Perry; and (1 2) Dr. Merondet in the manner specified by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint (dkt. 2 ), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons) , and this Order. The clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that the twelve defendants enumerated in the preceding paragraph are the defendants in this action and terminate all other defendants previously identified on the docket. Fina lly, Mr. Cobb's motion for information, dkt. 8 , is granted insofar as this Order informs him that the complaint has been screened and that process will be issued to the defendants. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/22/2018. (NAD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
MALCOM D. COBB, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MR. ROSELL,
MR. ADAMS,
LEEANN IVERS,
STACY SCOTT,
LISA BERGESON,
MR. KEENZLI,
DR. PAUL TALBERT,
DR. PERRY,
NP JANE WAMBRI,
RN GENIFER BRADLY,
CARRIE WELDER,
NURSE SAMANTHA MCABEE,
BECKY DAVIS,
MELISSA BAGIENSKI,
SHAWNA SHELBY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:18-cv-00790-TWP-DLP
ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
Plaintiff Malcom Cobb is an inmate currently confined at the Miami Correctional Facility
(MCF). Because Mr. Cobb is a “prisoner” as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h), this Court has an
obligation under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) to screen his amended complaint before service on the
defendants.
I. Screening Standard
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), the Court must dismiss a complaint if it is frivolous or
malicious, fails to state a claim for relief, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is
immune from such relief. In determining whether a complaint states a claim, the Court applies the
same standard as when addressing a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(6). See Lagerstrom v. Kingston, 463 F.3d 621, 624 (7th Cir. 2006). To survive dismissal,
[the] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a
claim for relief that is plausible on its face. A claim has facial plausibility when
the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable
inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). Pro se complaints such as that filed by the plaintiff
are construed liberally and held “to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by
lawyers.” Perez v. Fenoglio, 792 F.3d 768, 776 (7th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation omitted).
II. The Complaint
Mr. Cobb’s complaint indicates that between April 2017 and February 2018, he suffered
from multiple serious medical conditions, including a knee injury, a foot injury, and high blood
pressure. During this period, he was confined at Pendleton Correctional Facility (PCF) and then
MCF. The defendants are Wexford Health, a private company contracted to provide medical care
to inmates at PCF and MCF, and medical professionals employed by Wexford to treat those
inmates.
The complaint includes numerous allegations that medical professionals at these prisons
refused to treat Mr. Cobb’s conditions properly—and, in some cases, that they refused to treat his
conditions at all. Examples include:
•
Wexford and Dr. Paul Talbot refused to permit Mr. Cobb to receive a knee
replacement recommended by an orthopedic surgeon;
•
Dr. Merondet refused to examine Mr. Cobb during a scheduled appointment
and maintained a course of treatment he knew to be ineffective;
•
several medical professionals decreased medication used to treat Mr. Cobb’s
symptoms even though the symptoms persisted and—in some cases—refused
to provide him with medication that had been prescribed; and
•
several medical professionals refused to provide Mr. Cobb with bandages or
other materials to cover an open wound on his foot.
2
Mr. Cobb also alleges that Nurses Davis and Bagienski told other inmates that he was a
“snitch” and that Dr. Talbot punished him by withholding treatment, medication, and recreation
time. Construed liberally, this may be read as an allegation that these defendants retaliated against
Mr. Cobb for conduct protected by the First Amendment. Finally, Mr. Cobb alleges that many of
the actions described above were directed by Wexford or its upper-level administrators or the
consequence of a Wexford practice or policy of staffing the prison with too few medical
professionals to provide adequate care.
III. Claims that Shall Proceed
This action shall proceed with claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that the following
defendants were deliberately indifferent to Mr. Cobb’s serious medical needs in violation of his
Eighth Amendment rights: Dr. Paul Talbot, LeeAnn Ivers, Lisa Bergeson, Jane Wambri, Genifer
Bradley, Becky Davis, Samantha McAbee, Melissa Bagienski, Shawna Shelby, Dr. Perry, and Dr.
Merondet. The action shall also proceed with claims that Defendants Davis, Bagienski, and Talbot
retaliated against Mr. Cobb for conduct protected by the First Amendment. Finally, the action shall
proceed with a claim that Mr. Cobb’s Eighth Amendment rights were violated as a consequence
of official Wexford policies or practices.
IV. Insufficient Claims
The complaint identifies several defendants not listed in Part III of this Order. These
include Defendants Rosell, Adams, Scott, Keenzli, and Welder. The complaint does not include
any factual allegations that these defendants were personally involved in denying Mr. Cobb
adequate medical care or any other right. Individual liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 “requires
personal involvement in the alleged constitutional deprivation.” Colbert v. City of Chicago, 851
3
F.3d 649, 657 (7th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation omitted). Therefore, all claims against these
individuals are dismissed.
Similarly, the complaint indicates that Corizon, Inc., contracted to provide medical care to
inmates before April 1, 2017, but does not include any factual allegations that his rights were
violated as a consequence of an official Corizon policy or practice before that date. Accordingly,
to the extent the complaint asserts any claims against Corizon, they are also dismissed.
V. Duty to Update Address
Mr. Cobb shall report any change of address within ten (10) days of any change. The Court
must be able to locate Mr. Cobb to communicate with him. If Mr. Cobb fails to keep the Court
informed of his current address, the action may be subject to dismissal for failure to comply with
Court orders and failure to prosecute.
VI. Summary of Claims, Issuance of Process, and Further Proceedings
This action shall proceed with (1) Eighth Amendment medical claims against Defendants
Talbot, Ivers, Bergeson, Wambri, Bradley, Davis, McAbee, Bagienski, Shelby, Perry, and
Merondet; (2) First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Davis, Bagienski, and
Talbot; and (3) an Eighth Amendment policy-or-practice claim against Wexford. This summary
of claims includes all viable claims identified by the Court. If Mr. Cobb believes that additional
claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court, he shall have through
September 17, 2018, in which to identify those claims.
The clerk is designated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) to issue process
to Defendants (1) Wexford Health; (2) Dr. Paul Talbot; (3) LeeAnn Ivers; (4) Lisa Bergeson; (5)
Jane Wambri; (6) Genifer Bradley; (7) Becky Davis; (8) Samantha McAbee; (9) Melissa
Bagienski; (10) Shawna Shelby; (11) Dr. Perry; and (12) Dr. Merondet in the manner specified by
4
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint (dkt. 2), applicable
forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service
of Summons), and this Order.
The clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that the twelve defendants enumerated
in the preceding paragraph are the defendants in this action and terminate all other defendants
previously identified on the docket.
Finally, Mr. Cobb’s motion for information, dkt. [8], is granted insofar as this Order
informs him that the complaint has been screened and that process will be issued to the defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
8/22/2018
5
Distribution:
MALCOM D. COBB, JR.
231767
MIAMI - CF
MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Electronic Service Participant – Court Only
Becky Davis
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Wexford Health
c/o Registered Agent, Douglas P. Long
500 N. Meridian Street, Suite 300
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Samantha McAbee
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Dr. Paul Talbot
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Melissa Bagienski
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
LeeAnn Ivers
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Shawna Shelby
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Lisa Bergeson
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Dr. Perry
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Jane Wambri
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Dr. Merondet
Medical Provider
Miami Correctional Facility
3038 West 850 South
Bunker Hill, IN 46914
Genifer Bradley
Medical Provider
Pendleton Correctional Facility
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Courtesy copy by electronic service to:
Douglass A. Bitner
Katz Korin Cunningham, P. C.
dbitner@kkclegal.com
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?