Filing 15

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Reconsideration. (See Order). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 9/8/2020. (MAC)

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-03047-JPH-MPB Document 15 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION BRENDA L. WHITE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ST. LAWRENCE CATHOLIC SCHOOL, Defendant. No. 1:19-cv-03047-JPH-MPB ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER On July 20, 2020, the Court entered final judgment, dismissing Ms. White's complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. 13. On August 6, 2020, Ms. White filed a motion to "reconsider and request equitable tolling or equitable estopp[el]." Dkt. 14. The Court interprets this motion as a motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). "To establish relief under Rule 59(e), a movant must demonstrate a manifest error of law or fact or present newly discovered evidence." Vesely v. Armslist LLC, 762 F.3d 661, 666 (7th Cir. 2014). Ms. White's motion does not establish any "manifest error of law or fact" and does not present "newly discovered evidence." See dkt. 14. The Court dismissed her previous complaint because she did not show that a federal court had subject matter jurisdiction over this case. See dkt. 12. Her current motion also does not address that point. See dkt. 14. Accordingly, her motion to reconsider, dkt. [14], is denied. SO ORDERED. 1 Case 1:19-cv-03047-JPH-MPB Document 15 Filed 09/08/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 39 Date: 9/8/2020 Distribution: BRENDA L. WHITE 4141 N Ridgeview Drive Indianapolis, IN 46226 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?