NGUYEN v. HAMILTON EXHIBITS, LLC

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 42), grants the Defendant's Motion for Sanctions, (ECF No. 30), dismisses Plaintiff's Amended Complaint with prejudice for his s poliation of evidence, and grants Defendant's request for reasonable attorney's fees associated with bringing the motion for sanctions. This action will be dismissed with prejudice. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 1/8/2021.(JDC)

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-04330-JRS-DML Document 43 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 223 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION XUAN T. NGUYEN, Plaintiff, v. HAMILTON EXHIBITS, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:19-cv-04330-JRS-DML Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Granting Motion for Sanctions On November 18, 2020, Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch issued a Report and Recommendation on Defendant's motion for sanctions, recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint with prejudice and award Defendant its reasonable attorney's fees in bringing the sanctions motion. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections thereto must be filed within fourteen days after service and that the failure to file any objection would constitute waiver of subsequent review absent a showing of good cause. Plaintiff did not file any objection within fourteen days after service of the Report and Recommendation; nor did he seek an extension of time within which to do so. As of this date, Plaintiff has filed no objection or other response to the Report and Recommendation. He has therefore waived any objection that he may have had. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation as well as the motion for sanctions and the record, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is Case 1:19-cv-04330-JRS-DML Document 43 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 224 appropriate and warranted. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 42), grants the Defendant's Motion for Sanctions, (ECF No. 30), dismisses Plaintiff's Amended Complaint with prejudice for his spoliation of evidence, and grants Defendant's request for reasonable attorney's fees associated with bringing the motion for sanctions. This action will be dismissed with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Date: 1/8/2021 Distribution: XUAN T. NGUYEN 158 Longfellow Lane Greenfield, IN 46140 Jeffrey Wayne Parker, Jr. OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. (Indianapolis) jeffrey.parker@ogletree.com Scott James Preston OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. (Indianapolis) Scott.Preston@ogletreedeakins.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?