Filing 11

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 9/8/2020. (MAC)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-00972-JPH-TAB Document 11 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION BRENDA L. WHITE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. SOUTHEAST HEALTH CENTER, PETER KIM DR., Defendants. No. 1:20-cv-00972-JPH-TAB ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT On July 27, 2020, the Court entered final judgment in this case, dismissing Ms. White's federal claims with prejudice and her state law claims without prejudice. Dkt. 9. On August 26, 2020, Ms. White filed a motion to amend her complaint with this Court. Dkt. [10]. "Once final judgment has been entered in a case, the district court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a motion for leave to amend the complaint unless the plaintiff also moves for relief from the judgment." Childress v. Walker, 787 F.3d 433, 442 (7th Cir. 2015). Ms. White has not moved to alter or amend the judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), nor has she moved for relief from the final judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. See dkt. 10. As a result, the Court cannot entertain Ms. White's motion, and her motion to amend the complaint, dkt. [10], is denied. SO ORDERED. Date: 9/8/2020 1 Case 1:20-cv-00972-JPH-TAB Document 11 Filed 09/08/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 33 Distribution: BRENDA L. WHITE 4141 N Ridgeview Drive Indianapolis, IN 46226 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?