EDMONDSON et al v. GERMAN AMERICAN BANK

Filing 33

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND - Plaintiffs, Miranda and Joshua Edmondson, brought this action on September 2, 2022, raising several state-law claims against German American Bank. The Edmondsons' motion for leave to amend is therefore GRANTED under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). Dkt. 29 . The Edmondsons must file their Amended Complaint, dkt. 29-1, by February 3, 2023. Because German American Bank's motion to dismiss addressed the original Complaint, it is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Dkt. 17 (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/18/2023. (DWH)

Case 1:22-cv-01745-JPH-KMB Document 33 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 679

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
MIRANDA P. EDMONDSON,
JOSHUA A. EDMONDSON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs,
v.
GERMAN AMERICAN BANK,
Defendant.

No. 1:22-cv-01745-JPH-KMB

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND
Plaintiffs, Miranda and Joshua Edmondson, brought this action on
September 2, 2022, raising several state-law claims against German American
Bank. Dkt. 1. In November 2022, German American Bank responded to the
Complaint by filing a motion to dismiss or to compel arbitration under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3). Dkt. 17. The next month—after the time to
amend "as a matter of course" had expired, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)—the
Edmondsons filed a motion for leave to file an Amended Complaint and
"shorten[ ] the period for which Plaintiffs allege German American is liable" for
allegedly unlawful fee practices. Dkt. 29 at 4. German American Bank
opposes the motion for leave to amend, arguing that it is futile because the
Edmondsons' claims remain "subject to mandatory arbitration." Dkt. 31 at 1.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), the "court should freely
give leave [to amend] when justice so requires." See Runnion v. Girl Scouts of
Greater Chi. & Nw. Ind., 786 F.3d 510, 519 (7th Cir. 2015). A plaintiff should
therefore "be given every opportunity to cure a formal defect in his pleading . . .
1

Case 1:22-cv-01745-JPH-KMB Document 33 Filed 01/18/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 680

even [if] the court doubts that plaintiff will be able to overcome the defects." Id.
If "it is clear that the defect cannot be corrected so that amendment is futile, it
might do no harm to deny leave to amend." Id. But "[s]uch cases of clear
futility at the outset of a case are rare" and "[a]mendment should be refused
only if it appears to a certainty that plaintiff cannot state a claim." Id.
German American Bank's motion to dismiss the original Complaint and
its opposition to the Amended Complaint based on futility would each have to
be reviewed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3). See Nowlin v.
Prtizker, 34 F.4th 629, 635 (7th Cir. 2022). Allowing parallel briefing on those
issues "in piecemeal fashion" would thus "force the court" to essentially resolve
two "motions to dismiss instead of one." O'Boyle v. Real Time Resolutions, 910
F.3d 338, 348 (7th Cir. 2018). Granting leave to amend, by contrast, would
clarify the timing of the allegedly unlawful fees and the relevant arbitration
provisions, including any potentially retroactive application of those provisions.
See dkt. 31 at 9. The Edmondsons also promptly sought leave to amend in
response to the motion to dismiss, instead of risking a finding of "undue delay
and unfair prejudice" by waiting for a ruling on the motion to dismiss. O'Boyle,
910 F.3d at 348; see Fosnight v. Jones, 41 F.4th 916, 924–25 (7th Cir. 2022).
For these reasons, "applying the liberal standard for amending pleadings,
especially in the early stages of a lawsuit, is the best way to ensure" that this
case "will be decided justly." Runnion, 786 F.3d at 520; see Saint Anthony
Hosp. v. Eagleson, 40 F.4th 492, 517–18 (7th Cir. 2022).

2

Case 1:22-cv-01745-JPH-KMB Document 33 Filed 01/18/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 681

The Edmondsons' motion for leave to amend is therefore GRANTED
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). Dkt. [29]. The Edmondsons
must file their Amended Complaint, dkt. 29-1, by February 3, 2023.
Because German American Bank's motion to dismiss addressed the original
Complaint, it is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Dkt. [17].
SO ORDERED.
Date: 1/18/2023

Distribution:
All electronically registered counsel.

3