UPCHURCH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Magistrate Judge submitted her Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint [Dkt. 32 ]. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of t his Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in full, and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint [Dkt. 26 ]. See Order. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/4/2024.(LF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION TIMOTHY UPCHURCH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF INDIANA, ) INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ) INDIANA STATE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, ) WENDY KNIGHT Warden, in her official and ) individual capacities, ) ANDREW COLE Deputy Warden, in his official ) and individual capacities, ) ) Defendants. ) No. 1:23-cv-01310-SEB-KMB ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Magistrate Judge submitted her Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint [Dkt. 32]. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation in full, and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint [Dkt. 26]. 6/4/2024 Date: _________________ _______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: Richard L. Darst COHEN GARELICK & GLAZIER rdarst@cgglawfirm.com James Alex Emerson COOTS HENKE & WHEELER, P.C. aemerson@chwlaw.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?