GREEN v. BASINGER
Filing
22
ENTRY - petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing 21 is denied, because such a proceeding is only necessary when a more extensive factual record must be compiled to decide an issue. That is not the case here. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/19/2011.(copy to petitioner via US mail) (VS)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
RUBEN GREEN,
Petitioner,
v.
JAMES BASINGER,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:11-cv-094-JMS-WGH
ENTRY
The petitioner’s motion for an evidentiary hearing [21] is denied, because such a
proceeding is only necessary when a more extensive factual record must be compiled to
decide an issue. See Newell v. Hanks, 283 F.3d 827, 838 (7th Cir. 2002). That is not the
case here.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
08/19/2011
Date: ________________
_______________________________
Distribution:
James.martin@atg.in.gov
Ruben Green
DOC #160642
Wabash Valley Correctional Facility
6908 S. Old U.S. Highway 41
P.O. Box 500
Carlisle, IN 47838
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
