CLINTON v. MARBERRY et al

Filing 27

ENTRY denying 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment - Consistent with the foregoing (SEE ENTRY), therefore, and noting that the defendants' motion for summary judgment is not even fully briefed at this point, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 24 is DENIED without prejudice. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/6/2011. (JKS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA JACQUES CLINTON, Plaintiff, vs. LT. BRACE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:11-cv-104-JMS-MJD ENTRY This is an action brought pursuant to the theory recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 38 (1971). Each party has filed a motion for summary judgment. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment is based on the argument that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies prior to filing this action. The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is on his view of the merits of his claim pursuant to the Eighth Amendment’s proscription against the imposition of cruel and unusual punishment. Circuit precedent dictates that a failure-to-exhaust defense be resolved prior to the merits of a claim being addressed. Perez v. Wis. Dep't of Corr., 182 F.3d 532, 536 (7th Cir. 1999) ("The statute [requiring administrative exhaustion] can function properly only if the judge resolves disputes about its application before turning to any other issue in the suit."). Consistent with the foregoing, therefore, and noting that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is not even fully briefed at this point, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [24] is denied without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12/06/2011 Date: _________________ _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: Jacques Clinton No. 40758-004 Edgefield - FCI Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. Box 725 Edgefield, SC 29824 Jeffrey L. Hunter United States Attorney’s Office jeff.hunter@usdoj.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?