KIDERLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filing
64
ORDER denying 57 Motion for Reconsideration. The tendered subpoenas by petitioner will not be issued. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/11/2012. (SMD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
STEVEN D. KIDERLEN,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
)
WARDEN, United States Penitentiary,)
)
Respondent.
)
No. 2:11-cv-127-JMS-DKL
Entry Concerning Selected Matters
The court, having considered the above action and the matters which are
pending, makes the following rulings:
1.
The petitioner’s motion for immediate reconsideration [57] is denied.
The reason for this ruling is that the motion is unfocused and fails to identify any
specific deficiency in any specific ruling issued in this case. See Patel v. Gonzales
442 F.3d 1011, 1015-1016 (7th Cir. 2006) (“A motion to reconsider asks that a
decision be reexamined in light of additional legal arguments, a change of law, or an
argument that was overlooked earlier . . . .”).
2.
The petitioner has tendered subpoenas. These shall not be issued
because a hearing has not been set, because discovery has not been authorized, and
because there is no showing that the resolution of the action, which is now fully
briefed, requires or would be advanced through the issuance of the tendered
subpoenas.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
01/11/2012
Date: ______________________
_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Distribution:
Steven D. Kiderlen
No. 32711-044
United States Penitentiary
P.O. Box 019001
Atwater, CA 95301
Gerald A. Coraz
United States Attorney’s Office
gerald.coraz@usdoj.gov
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?