KIDERLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 64

ORDER denying 57 Motion for Reconsideration. The tendered subpoenas by petitioner will not be issued. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/11/2012. (SMD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA STEVEN D. KIDERLEN, ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) WARDEN, United States Penitentiary,) ) Respondent. ) No. 2:11-cv-127-JMS-DKL Entry Concerning Selected Matters The court, having considered the above action and the matters which are pending, makes the following rulings: 1. The petitioner’s motion for immediate reconsideration [57] is denied. The reason for this ruling is that the motion is unfocused and fails to identify any specific deficiency in any specific ruling issued in this case. See Patel v. Gonzales 442 F.3d 1011, 1015-1016 (7th Cir. 2006) (“A motion to reconsider asks that a decision be reexamined in light of additional legal arguments, a change of law, or an argument that was overlooked earlier . . . .”). 2. The petitioner has tendered subpoenas. These shall not be issued because a hearing has not been set, because discovery has not been authorized, and because there is no showing that the resolution of the action, which is now fully briefed, requires or would be advanced through the issuance of the tendered subpoenas. IT IS SO ORDERED. 01/11/2012 Date: ______________________ _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: Steven D. Kiderlen No. 32711-044 United States Penitentiary P.O. Box 019001 Atwater, CA 95301 Gerald A. Coraz United States Attorney’s Office gerald.coraz@usdoj.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?