SMITH v. BROWN

Filing 18

Order Discussing Petitioner's Motion to Re-open Case - denying 17 Motion to re-open case. (See Order.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/30/2012. (RSF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA ERIC D. SMITH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SUPERINTENDENT BROWN, ) ) Defendant. ) 2:11-cv-206-JMS-DKL Order Discussing Petitioner’s Motion to Re-open Case This action in which Eric Smith sought a writ of habeas corpus was dismissed without prejudice in a Judgment entered on the clerk’s docket on August 30, 2011. Smith has filed a motion to re-open case, which because of its timing relative to the entry of final judgment on the clerk’s docket, must be treated as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See United States v. Deutsch, 981 F.2d 299, 301 (7th Cir. 1992) (“substantive motions to alter or amend a judgment served more than ten days after the entry of judgment are to be evaluated under Rule 60(b).”).1 Smith’s post-judgment motion [17] is denied for these reasons: First, it was not brought within a “reasonable time” as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(c). Second, it seeks relief premised on an asserted legal error, which is not a valid basis upon which relief can be granted under rule 60(b). See Marques v. FRB, 286 F.3d 1014, 1018-19 (7th Cir. 2002) ("A legal error is not one of the specified grounds for [a 60(b) motion]. In fact, it is a forbidden ground."). And third, this action was dismissed without prejudice. “[A]fter a dismissal without prejudice, the plaintiff can resurrect his lawsuit only by filing a new complaint.” U.S. v. Ligas, 549 F.3d 497, 503 (7th Cir. 2008). IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________ 04/30/2012 Date: __________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana 1The current version of Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a Rule 59(e) motion to be filed within 28 days after the entry of judgment. This change is of no consequence here, where Smith's post judgment motion was filed more than 28 days after the entry of judgment. Distribution: Eric D. Smith DOC #112675 Wabash Valley Correctional Facility - Inmate Mail/Parcels 6908 S. Old U.S. Highway 41 P.O. Box 1111 Carlisle, IN 47838

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?