MILLER V. MARBERRY ET AL.
Filing
7
ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - The clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2), to issue process to the defendants. Process shall consist of a summons. The Marshal for this District or his Deputy shall serve the summons, togethe r with a copy of the complaint, filed on September 8, 2011, and a copy of this Entry, on the defendants and on the officials designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2), at the expense of the United States. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/21/2011.(copy to plaintiff via us mail)(VS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
WILLIAM ALLEN MILLER,
Plaintiff,
vs.
H.J. MARBERRY, Warden, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:11-cv-262-JMS-DKL
Entry Directing Further Proceedings
The complaint has been screened as required by 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A(b). The
clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2), to issue process to the
defendants. Process shall consist of a summons. Because plaintiff William Allen Miller is
proceeding under the theory recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), personal service is required.
Robinson v. Turner, 15 F.3d 82 (7th Cir. 1994). The Marshal for this District or his
Deputy shall serve the summons, together with a copy of the complaint, filed on
September 8, 2011, and a copy of this Entry, on the defendants and on the officials
designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2), at the expense of the United States.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10/21/2011
Date: __________________
Distribution:
William Allen Miller
#77436-012
Florence High - U.S.P
Inmate Mail/Parcels
P.O. Box 7000
Florence, CO 81226
United States Marshal
46 East Ohio Street
179 U.S. Courthouse
Indianapolis, IN 46204
_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?