NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
Filing
17
Entry and Notice - Final judgment has been entered in this action. Until the plaintiff's motion for further processing was filed with the clerk on April 13, 2012, the post-judgment filings have been made by a non-party, David Nelson. The r elief sought in those filings has been denied, and notifications of such rulings have been returned undelivered. Based on the foregoing, therefore, the motion for further processing 16 is of no effect and any relief sought through such motion is denied. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/19/2012. (RSF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
ROBERT DAVID NEAL,
Plaintiff,
vs.
F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:12-cv-40-JMS-DKL
Entry and Notice
Final judgment has been entered in this action. Until the plaintiff’s motion
for further processing was filed with the clerk on April 13, 2012, the post-judgment
filings have been made by a non-party, David Nelson. The relief sought in those
filings has been denied, and notifications of such rulings have been returned
undelivered.
[A] Acause@ (that is, lawsuit) cannot continue to exist once every Acause
of action@ within it has been dismissed.
Price v. Wyeth Holdings Corp., 505 F.3d 624, 629 (7th Cir. 2007).
Based on the foregoing, therefore, the motion for further processing [16] is of
no effect and any relief sought through such motion is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
04/19/2012
Date: __________________
_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Distribution:
Robert David Neal
No. 15151-180
Inmate Mail/Parcels
P.O. Box 33
Terre Haute, IN 47808
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?